Leaving the basilisk aside, if you do not care about it or believe it, what motivates you to revisit it? It seems like you agree with the community's current conclusion.

This was concluded. It's not exciting. No one cares. Go read the posts about it.

Why do you think so? It's a thought experiment about punitive acausal trade from before people realized that benevolent acausal trade was equally possible. I don't think it's the most interesting idea to come out of the Less Wrong community anymore.