[SEQ RERUN] Is That Your True Rejection?
post by MinibearRex · 2012-12-14T04:03:23.595Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 3 commentsToday's post, Is That Your True Rejection? was originally published on 06 December 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
People's stated reason for a rejection may not be the same as the actual reason for that rejection.
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Friendly Projects vs. Products, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.
3 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by shminux · 2012-12-14T18:37:55.587Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
if any professor out there wants to let me come in and just do a PhD in analytic philosophy—just write the thesis and defend it—then I have, for my own use, worked out a general and mathematically elegant theory of Newcomblike decision problems. I think it would make a fine PhD thesis, and it is ready to be written—if anyone has the power to let me do things the old-fashioned way.
So, has anyone made the offer?
Replies from: Jayson_Virissimo, diegocaleiro↑ comment by Jayson_Virissimo · 2012-12-15T01:29:49.421Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
So, has anyone made the offer?
Good question. I would think that Bostrom (if he wanted to), could make this happen.
↑ comment by diegocaleiro · 2012-12-17T04:02:15.917Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Yes, it was in one of the original commentaries. The proposal didn't go through though.