post by [deleted] · · ? · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Charlie Steiner · 2022-06-25T18:30:20.253Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I've got 26 words for you:

Humans are good at spotting FOs, but often U them. Planes seen through IR cameras, balloons, cars on a hill, reflections, too-close insects, all often Ued.

Replies from: TrevorWiesinger
comment by trevor (TrevorWiesinger) · 2022-06-25T18:40:05.284Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'm mainly referring to the pentagon's recent bizarre claims about UFO footage e.g. from navy sensors. But yeah, I can totally buy that the military has been vacillating back and forth over whether to encourage people in rural areas to photograph spy-plane-like phenomenon, Possibly including difficulties with the rural people having incentives to forge and sell evidence, which could suddenly become much less of a problem in the late 2010s due to new technology that can handle all sorts of false positives.

Replies from: Charlie Steiner
comment by Charlie Steiner · 2022-06-25T20:07:26.029Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I am absolutely not exempting video or eyewitness accounts from pilots or members of armed forces, when I say that humans spot UFOs by failing to identify a FO, and that this happens with mundane FOs at a high rate.