post by [deleted] · · ? · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Benquo · 2018-07-03T18:17:22.958Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

One needs to play the game, but the real payoff is exploiting these power dynamics for code injection attacks, not sitting on a big pile of shiny mids who want you dead. This post was helpful in crystallizing this intuition for me.

Replies from: Benquo
comment by Benquo · 2018-07-03T18:26:33.901Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Maybe the most spectacular failure of a high strategy in a centralized declining empire in recent memory is the way Louis XIV's played France. Building Versailles was basically the stationary-predator equivalent of exhaustion-hunting the aristocracy, forcing them to domesticate themselves (and, unfortunately, domesticating his own successor as well). This effectively destroyed the mids as power players, but didn't replace them with anything, and was accompanied with an expansion of the administrative state for purely extractive purposes. This created the incredibly explosive environment that enabled the Low Revolution.

What would a better-played version of this strategy look like? First, send your sons abroad for education, hire the best tutors, do whatever you have to to keep them away from Versailles and out of the hands of others like the Church who would subvert them. Second, Versailles is needlessly wasteful - harvest the free energy you're releasing by training your surplus aristocrats in something likely to produce long-run instantiations of your values (e.g. make them a viable competitor to the priestly class that's more French), but that isn't a direct threat to your power, instead of just peacocking. Third, when centralizing extractive institutions, again put a lot of work into causing them to directly instantiate your values as a side effect.

comment by Benquo · 2018-07-03T18:13:35.754Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Second, low players can be weaponized by mid players against mid opponents. This takes the form of a low player supporting or protecting a low player that is frustrating their common opponent.

Did you mean "This takes the form of a mid player supporting &c."?

comment by ChristianKl · 2018-07-03T14:51:37.022Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

A really interesting example of mid-vs. high is what played out inside the democratic party in the last years. The high tried to concentrate all the party money to be channeled on a few firms and focused on being spent on winning the presidential race while lower levels of the party didn't get much money and as result lost a lot races all over the place.