Is intellectual work better construed as exploration or performance?

post by ioannes_shade · 2019-01-25T21:59:28.381Z · score: 14 (4 votes) · LW · GW · 1 comment

This is a question post.

Contents

  Answers
    3 Elo
None
1 comment

Cross-posted to the EA Forum [EA · GW].

I notice I rely on two metaphors of intellectual work:

1. intellectual work as exploration – intellectual work is an expedition through unknown territory (a la Meru, a la Amundsen & the South Pole). It's unclear whether the expedition will be successful; the explorers band together to function as one unit & support each other; the value of the work is largely "in the moment" / "because it's there", the success of the exploration is mostly determined by objective criteria.

Examples: Andrew Wiles spending six years in secrecy to prove Fermat's Last Theorem, Distill's essays on machine learning, Robert Caro's books, Donne Martin's data science portfolio (clearly a labor of love)

2. intellectual work as performance – intellectual work is a performative act with an audience (a la Black Swan, a la Super Bowl halftime shows). It's not clear that any given performance will succeed, but there will always be a "best performance"; performers tend to compete & form factions; the value of the work accrues afterward / the work itself is instrumental; the success of the performance is mostly determined by subjective criteria.

Examples: journal impact factors, any social science result that's published but fails to replicate, academic dogfights on Twitter, TED talks


Clearly both metaphors do work – I'm wondering which is better to cultivate on the margin.

My intuition is that it's better to lean on the image of intellectual work as exploration; curious what folks here think.

Answers

answer by Elo · 2019-01-26T23:06:10.644Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · LW · GW

A duality of both at once. By stripping away intention to "looking good" and going for demonstrations of genuine exploration, the best performance will be produced.

With an intention to have tight feedback loops. If that can be demonstrated, that's a big step towards both goals.

1 comment

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by MysticMan · 2019-01-26T02:23:02.929Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

I would agree its both, when I talk to my team I use the words "exploration" and "experimentation" a lot and when we talk to outsiders there is definitely a performative aspect. One of the issues I've encountered, is in determining the best way transition between exploration and performance given the predilections of different audiences. I think its hard for some people to make this transition in thinking/acting and have been spending much of my time thinking about it.