Posts

Comments

Comment by binbashjip on The Cognitive Science of Rationality · 2013-05-07T06:37:03.323Z · LW · GW

Over the last 1000 years: varying criticalness Over the last 20-30 years or so: less and less critical

Has there been some research on culturalness of thinking errors? I thought the claim was that these thinking errors are hardwired in the brain, hence timeless and uncultural.

Comment by binbashjip on The Cognitive Science of Rationality · 2013-05-06T23:35:35.091Z · LW · GW

I see how that might have been confusing. The 1000 years ago was simply an example to question whether people have always made the same thinking errors. The criticalness is based only on recent history, mostly on the people around me and is an attempt to argue in favor of possible external factors.

Comment by binbashjip on The Cognitive Science of Rationality · 2013-05-06T23:05:21.261Z · LW · GW

I don't believe that people have become steadily less or more critical, but it seems plausible that this has varied in non-steady ways, increasing or decreasing depending on the circumstances. I would expect that in this case the degree to which people make common thinking errors also varies. In fact, I suspect that the 2 4 6 test yields different results depending on the subjects' education, regardless of whether they know of positive bias.

Comment by binbashjip on The Cognitive Science of Rationality · 2013-05-06T20:54:54.258Z · LW · GW

Nice article! I was wondering though whether there were any theories on why our brain works the way it does. And did we make the same mistakes, say 1000 years ago? I am new here, so I don't know what the main thoughts on this are, but I did read HPMOR which seems to suggest that this was always the case. However, it seems to me that people are becoming less and less critical, perhaps because they are too busy or because the level of education has steadily decreased over the last decennia. How could we actually prove that these fallacies aren't caused by some external factors?