Posts
Comments
a new crackpot-index!:
1- a physicist who promotes his own views in books, and blaming the unpopularity of his view on the amount of crackpots in physics 2- someone who gives a clearly false image of the reception of a theory 3 - someone who hasn't got a proper education on physics, calling the majority of physics crackpots 4- someone who thinks 'science' itself isn't the best method for science 5- someone who postulates very big ideas, and says he doesn't need observations to prove it 6 - someone referring to 'in the future' we may have these observations, as a proof
karma/quantum police was very active today
oh yeah and arrest smooth, and even gell-man and leon cooper while you're at it
karma police, arrest this man his proposition, is making me feel ill, and i want to belie-ie-ieve
karma police, arrest 't hooft, and polizer, they making it seem, like i'm na-ie-ie-ieve
this is way you get (2x) when you mess with worlds,
quantum police, I've given 50 years it's not enough, to make a little sense of Everret's multiverse
This is what you get(2x) of many-worlds
Fiew for the mwi, I lost myself (2x) Fiew for crackpottery, I lost myself (2x)