Posts
Comments
It ought to be a top-level post on the EA forum as well.
Well that's because it's meant to be quantifying over linear equations. and are not meant to be replaced but and are.
i is often used as an index in math, similar to how it is used as an index in for loops.
What would an event optimized for this sort of thing look like?
Why not generate it after it's posted publically?
Aaaa! I'm used to Arial or whatever Windows' default display font is. The larger stroke weight is rather uncomfortable to me.
Yarvin was not part of the CCRU. I think Land and Yarvin only became associates post-CCRU.
Maybe make a post on the EA forum?
It seems like if the SCP hypothesis is true, block characters should cause it to act strangely.
Does it not have any sort of metadata telling you where it comes from?
My only guess is that some of it is probably metal lyrics.
Is this an LLM generation or part of the training data?
I don't see how 3 follows.
That's because we don't have the intelligence to exterminate ants (without causing more problems.)
On another note, if an artificial superintelligence needed a human for something, it would probably be able to find someone it could convince on the spot, no pre-built religion needed.
We have nothing to offer. Anything we can do, an artificial superintelligence can do better, with space and energy and atoms we irritatingly take up.
Why would we want to worship AI?
I think the thing that actually makes people more rational is thinking of them as principles you can apply to your own life rather than abstract notions, which is hard to communicate in a Wikipedia page about Dutch books.
Emmett Shear might also count, but he might merely be rationalist-adjacent.
IMO trying the problem yourself before researching it makes you appreciate what other people have already done even more. It's pretty easy to fall victim to hindsight bias if you haven't experienced the difficulty of actually getting anywhere.
they figure out planting and then rationally collaborate with each other?
I feel like they would end up converging on the same problems that plague human sociality.
I think asociality might prevent the development of altruistic ethics.
Also it's hard to see how an asocial species would develop civilization.
This reminds me of Moravec's paradox.
You should read Greg Egan's excellent novel Permutation City.
I think working on safety roles at capabilities orgs is mostly mutually exclusive with a pause, so I don't think this is that remarkable.
Sorta? Usually the idea is that the presence or absence of hardware determines the anthropic probability of being that conscious process, otherwise you would expect to be some random arbitrary Boltzmann brain-like conscious.
Also this is an immediate corollary of the mathematical universe hypothesis, which says our universe is a mathematical structure.
I feel like you're not giving enough credit to Greg Egan since he came up with all the philosophy himself.
Let's hope not!
I remember going to a city and seeing someone on the subway loudly threatening nonexistent people. I wasn't scared, I just felt bad that in all likelihood, the world had failed this person through no fault of their own.
I like this format and framing of "90% of what matters" and someone should try doing it with other subjects.
Decision theory/trade reasons
I think this still means MIRI is correct when it comes to the expected value though
The thing that got me was Pause AI trying to coalition with people against AI art. I don't really have anything against the idea of a pause but Pause AI seems a bit simulacrum level 2 for me.
A subpoena for what?
I don't think I'm really looking for something like that, since it doesn't touch on the perception of music as much as it does the reasons why we have it.
Isn't TLP's email on his website?
Sure, I just prefer a native bookmarking function.
I wish I could bookmark comments/shortform posts.
You can actually use this to do the sleeping beauty experiment IRL and thereby test SIA vs SSA. Unfortunately you can only get results if you're the one being put under.
This sort of begs the question of why we don't observe other companies assassinating whistleblowers.
I think there should be a way to find the highest rated shortform posts.
I like to phrase it as "the path to simplicity involves a lot of detours." Yes, Newtonian mechanics doesn't account for the orbit of Mercury but it turned out there was an even simpler, more parsimonious theory, general relativity, waiting for us.
Vanessa Kosoy has a list specifically for her alignment agenda but is probably applicable to agent foundations in general: https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/fsGEyCYhqs7AWwdCe/learning-theoretic-agenda-reading-list
We don't actually know if it's GPT 4.5 for sure. It could be an alternative training run that preceded the current version of ChatGPT 4 or even a different model entirely.
I think it disambiguates by saying it's specifically a crux as in "double crux"
Copied from a reply on lukehmiles' short form:
The hypothesis I would immediately come up with is that less traditionally masculine AMAB people are inclined towards less physical pursuits.
If it is related to IQ, however, this is less plausible, although perhaps some sort of selection effect is happening here.
The hypothesis I would immediately come up with is that less traditionally masculine AMAB people are inclined towards less physical pursuits.
This feels like Scott Alexander could've written something about, and it has the same revelatory quality.
I assume OP thought that there was some specific place in the training data the LLM was replicating.
I think that requires labeled data.
It doesn't and the developers don't label the data. The LLM learns that these categories exist during training because they can and it helps minimize the loss function.
I don't think there are necessarily any specific examples in the training data. LLMs can generalize to text outside of the training distribution.
Another problem is, why should we expect to be in the particles rather than just in the wave function directly? Both MWI and Bohmian mechanics have the wave function, after all. It might be the case that there are particles bouncing around but the branch of the wave function we live in has no relation to the positions of the particles.
Have you tried just copying and pasting an alignment research paper (or other materials) into a base model (or sufficiently base model-like modes of a model) to see how it completes it?