Posts
Comments
"I value freedom: When I'm deciding where to steer the future, I take into account not only the subjective states that people end up in, but also whether they got there as a result of their own efforts."
I am somewhat the same but must recognise that it is possible that, were I to be forced into pure bliss, I would not want to go back. My value set may shift or reveal itself to not be what I thought it was. (I think it is possible, maybe even normal, to be somewhat mistaken about which values one lives by.) In fact, it seems exceedingly plausible to me that I value freedom the more because I know what it means to be defenceless and in danger. I would care far less about having a back door out of anything if I perceived no threats.
And that begs the question which values am I to consider 'right': The ones I live by now or the ones I think it likely I would have in, for want of a better word, paradise?
Which raises the question: Is the latter an instrumental or a terminal value? Or does it vary?