Recommendations for donating to an anti-death cause

post by fowlertm · 2014-04-09T02:56:56.298Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 23 comments

Contents

23 comments

I've recently had the bad luck of having numerous people close to me die. Though I've wanted to contribute to anti-aging and anti-death research for a while, I'm only now in the position of being stable and materially well-off enough to throw around semi-serious cash.

Who should I donate to? I don't want to do anything with cryonics yet; I haven't given cryonics enough thought to be convinced it'd be worth the money. But I was considering the Methuselah foundation.

Suggestions?

23 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Vaniver · 2014-04-09T03:26:13.458Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I was considering the Methuselah foundation.

I donate to SENS directly, but haven't looked into whether or not that's better than donating to Methuselah.

comment by RomeoStevens · 2014-04-09T20:20:29.167Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

SENS is actively raising money. There is the issue that Calico might be pursuing several of the lines of inquiry SENS is with much more capital. But if this happens SENS will most likely pivot their active research.

The top of my list for organizations to investigate is currently the Brain Preservation Foundation. They administer the plastination prize. Robin Hanson outlines this a bit here. I think that contributing here is different from contributing to cryonics. Learning to preserve brain's structure moves multiple goal posts forward and has the potential to attract more research dollars into the area.

Replies from: John_Maxwell_IV
comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) · 2014-04-10T07:19:54.762Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Also, brain scanning research is likely good differential technological development.

Replies from: fowlertm
comment by fowlertm · 2014-04-10T14:54:40.772Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

The Brain Preservation Foundation was one of the first charities I thought of, I'll definitely be considering them.

comment by James_Miller · 2014-04-09T03:21:28.851Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

The Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Friendly AI is our best bet to defeat death, and unfriendly AI would probably kill us all.

Replies from: None
comment by [deleted] · 2014-04-09T13:41:09.158Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'm sure one exists somewhere on LessWrong or a related site, but is there a breakdown of how money donated to MIRI is utilized? I'd like to research the effects of potential contributions.

Replies from: Vaniver
comment by Vaniver · 2014-04-09T16:55:59.158Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

This is the current destination of the 'learn more' link on MIRI's donate page.

Replies from: None
comment by [deleted] · 2014-04-09T17:53:31.968Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Thank you.

comment by CronoDAS · 2014-04-10T03:15:46.942Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Do charities that focus on controlling infectious disease (malaria, tuberculosis, etc.) count?

Replies from: fowlertm
comment by fowlertm · 2014-04-10T15:34:35.335Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'd like to aim squarely at Death.

Replies from: CronoDAS
comment by CronoDAS · 2014-04-10T20:47:15.233Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

So saving people 30 and younger so they can die at 80 instead isn't good enough...

Replies from: ZankerH
comment by ZankerH · 2014-04-11T19:52:21.383Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

The point is extending maximal lifespan, not average lifespan.

Replies from: no_titman
comment by no_titman · 2014-05-03T19:09:31.245Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

It's also worth noting that those diseases mainly affect people in the developing countries. Personally I am interested in shaving my own ass.

comment by Yosarian2 · 2014-04-10T23:50:58.595Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

One possible thing to think about is medical research that targets the diseases that are the most common killers today.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm

Top 2 are heart disease and cancer, followed by lower respiratory infections, strokes, Alzheimer's, and diabetes.

I know it's not really what most of us think about when considering this, but I think that curing those diseases is likely to help us achieve "actuarial escape velocity".

Replies from: CronoDAS
comment by CronoDAS · 2014-04-11T03:59:16.264Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I once heard that a magical cancer cure would extend U.S. life expectancy at birth by three years...

Replies from: Yosarian2
comment by Yosarian2 · 2014-04-11T09:27:36.241Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Yeah, that's about right.

That being said, even if we cure everything else, we will still need to find a way to cure or prevent cancer, or it would still kill all of us eventually. Somehow curing cellular aging might lower the odds of getting cancer in any given year, but not eliminate it; younger people do sometimes get cancer.

I would say that finding a cure for cancer would be a necessary part of any biological longevity program.

comment by chaosmage · 2014-04-09T14:31:54.452Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Does it have to be a nonprofit, or would you consider investing in a startup company working towards anti-aging / anti-death goals?

Replies from: None
comment by [deleted] · 2014-04-09T18:24:22.390Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I can't answer for fowlertm, but if you have a list of such companies I would be interested!

Replies from: fowlertm, chaosmage
comment by fowlertm · 2014-04-09T21:43:36.466Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I would be interested, yes.

comment by chaosmage · 2014-04-11T11:02:24.963Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I do not have such a list, I just figure that there are places where they would be easy to find, such as Exponential Medicine.

comment by MichaelAnissimov · 2014-04-10T02:53:36.546Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Advise that you donate to MIRI.

comment by Error · 2014-04-09T15:22:26.859Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I don't have recommendations, but I'm interested in answers to this question too; I expect to reach a similar situation in a few years (and tentatively intend to donate to SENS).

comment by fowlertm · 2014-05-08T01:50:17.597Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

For those interested, I ended up donating to the Brain Preservation Foundation, MIRI, SENS, and the Alzheimer's Disease Research Fund.

More detail here:

http://rulerstothesky.wordpress.com/2014/04/25/in-memorium/