Update #2 to "Dominant Assurance Contract Platform": EnsureDone

post by moyamo · 2023-11-28T18:02:50.367Z · LW · GW · 2 comments

This is the second update to The Economics of the Asteroid Deflection Problem (Dominant Assurance Contracts) [LW · GW]. 

It took a bit longer than I expected but I finally launched a platform for raising money using Dominant Assurance Contracts: EnsureDone.

Why is it called EnsureDone? Well, we ran a naming contest on manifold.markets, and EnsureDone had the most Keynesian Beauty

We've launched with three projects

If any of these projects sound interesting, remember that

Pledging is a win-win situation.

If you are interested in producing public goods and using a Dominant Assurance Contract to raise funds apply to have your project featured on EnsureDone!

What's next?

Since I have a product I can sell to people. I'm going to focus the next few months on sales. 

I'm unlikely to post again on LessWrong, so if you are interested in this project join our Discord.

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by RomanHauksson (r) · 2023-11-28T20:16:09.628Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

This is really exciting. I’m surprised you’re the first person to spearhead a platform like this. Thank you!

I wonder if you could use a dominant assurance contract to raise money for retroactive public goods funding.

comment by JohnBuridan · 2023-11-28T23:13:50.977Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

What is the best way to build a liquid market of DACs?
For these to be and competitive a lot of people need to see them.