Meetup : Melbourne, practical rationality

post by matt · 2012-12-28T17:08:46.814Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 6 comments

Contents

  Discussion article for the meetup : Melbourne, practical rationality
  Discussion article for the meetup : Melbourne, practical rationality
None
6 comments

Discussion article for the meetup : Melbourne, practical rationality

WHEN: 04 January 2013 07:00:00PM (+1100)

WHERE: 55 Walsh St West Melbourne 3003

Practical rationality. This meetup repeats on the 1st Friday of each month and is distinct from our social meetup on the 3rd Friday of each month.

Discussion: http://groups.google.com/group/melbourne-less-wrong

All welcome from 6:30pm. Call the phone number on the door and I'll let you in.

Discussion article for the meetup : Melbourne, practical rationality

6 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by zuthagen · 2013-01-03T05:35:47.091Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I (Chris) plan to come tomorrow

comment by ShardPhoenix · 2013-01-01T09:24:56.887Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'm 50/50

comment by matt · 2013-01-03T00:39:03.170Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Judging by https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/melbourne-less-wrong/2dFTXTJRHZY and posts here (thanks Maelin) it's going to be a quiet one. I'll bring a couple of games in case we don't get critical mass for a raging storm of rational self improvement.

comment by Maelin · 2012-12-28T17:51:15.655Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Because the 4th of January is a time when many people might be away on holiday or otherwise unavailable, it would probably be worth getting a sense for numbers beforehand to avoid . If you expect to attend, please let us know (no commitment!) either in a comment here (and get a free upvote for your trouble), or on the mailing list group, or via some other suitable channel.

I'll start off by saying I expect to attend (~75% probability)

Replies from: None, toner
comment by [deleted] · 2012-12-31T04:05:56.489Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'll be there.

comment by toner · 2012-12-29T13:34:13.937Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I can't make it to this one.