[Link] Neural Correlates of Confusion?

post by atucker · 2011-10-06T23:52:45.445Z · score: 7 (7 votes) · LW · GW · Legacy · 3 comments


I found this article while researching something else and I was intrigued. Is this a neural correlate of confusion?

The P3b has been a prominent tool used to study cognitive processes for several decades. More specifically, this ERP component has played a key role in cognitive psychology research on information processing. Generally speaking, improbable events will elicit a P3b, and the less probable the event, the larger the P3b.[3] However, in order to elicit a P3b, the improbable event must be related to the task at hand in some way (for example, the improbable event could be an infrequent target letter in a stream of letters, to which a subject might respond with a button press). The P3b can also be used to measure how demanding a task is on cognitive workload.[4]

If so, awesome. Hats which actually do sound an alarm when your models are proven wrong could be arranged. I suspect that there might be things that make it not useful for that (like, if it also correlates with a bunch of other things). Seems like it's at least worth mentioning.


Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by shokwave · 2011-10-07T02:43:59.704Z · score: 4 (4 votes) · LW(p) · GW(p)

This sounds like it should be combined with neurofeedback so people can begin to train themselves to recognise this feeling!


comment by pedanterrific · 2011-10-07T02:59:01.394Z · score: 5 (5 votes) · LW(p) · GW(p)

Here's to the day when "I notice that I am confused" will be as superfluous as "I notice that I am in pain".

comment by jsalvatier · 2011-10-07T03:30:49.786Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW(p) · GW(p)