A well-defined history in measurable factor spaces
post by Matthias G. Mayer (matthias-georg-mayer) · 2023-10-05T18:36:05.037Z · LW · GW · 0 commentsContents
No comments
This is a technical post researching infinite factor spaces [LW · GW]
In a factor space , for a measurable , a -measurable index function is generating , if depends only on those arguments , where is , and . In this post, we show that there is an almost surely minimal such index function that we call the history of given .
We will reintroduce all the definitions from the finite case:
Let be finite. Let be a measure space with nullsets, i.e. is a set, is a -algebra and is a -ideal that admits a probability, i.e. there is with .
We define a product -ideal: Clearly, . We can extend this by induction to .
We construct . Furthermore, let .
Definition 1 (almost sure subset)
We will write .
Definition 2 (almost sure union with arbitrary index set)
If is a -ideal that admits a probability and
is a family of
measurable sets, then there exists an almost surely unique and minimal
with
i.e. whenever
, we have
. We set
Furthermore, there is
countable, s.t.
.
Proof. We will construct .
To start, choose any , and let .
Let be defined and let . Choose with and set and .
We set and
-
A contains : Let , we have to show . Assume not, then , so for all . Therefore, we have . Now , which is a contradiction.
-
Minimality and uniqueness: Now let . Then clearly, . If is also minimal, then clearly
Definition 3 (almost sure intersection)
We set .
Definition 4 (feature)
We call a measurable function a feature. In the following let be features.
Definition 5 (index function)
We call a measurable an index function. We write . We identify with , where to allow for set operations such as .
Definition 6
For an index function , we set .
Definition 7
We define that is almost surely a function of by .
Let be all product distributions whose nullsets are .
Definition 8 (conditional generation)
Let be . We write , if . Note that
Lemma 9
For let be and .
Then . Proof. Let , .
'': Obviously, . Let , then there is a with
'': Obviously, . Let , then there is with
Lemma 10
Let and . Then .
Proof. Let . We first show . For , let where etc. Let . We have Now
Now since sets of the form generate and are -stable, we have that .
It remains to show . Since , we have . Since the same holds true for , we get and therefore .
We claim .
'': Trivial.
'': Let
and
. Then . Therefore,
for a . We
claim . We have
,
we have . Similarly,
and therefore
.
Lemma 11
For , let .
Let . Then
.
Proof. Let . Clearly,
and .
We first show . Since , we have . Now . Clearly, is -stable and by Lemma 9 a generator of . Therefore, .
We now show . Let and
'" : Trivial.
'': From , we have
Therefore, .
Clearly, is a -stable generator of and therefore . Now, since , we have and therefore .
Definition 12 (history)
is the a.s. smallest generating index function.
Theorem 13 A history exists and is a.s. unique.
Proof. Existence: Let . Define . Now clearly, for each , there are countable many , such that . Now , and therefore . Furthermore, by construction we have for any , that which implies .
Uniqueness: Let be minimal, then clearly, .
0 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.