Essential Behaviorism Terms

post by Rivka · 2023-03-17T17:41:41.801Z · LW · GW · 1 comments

Most people have taken a psych 101 course and have some basic knowledge of behaviorism. Pavlov’s dogs, reinforcement, punishment…. Behaviorism is an incredibly useful tool and framework to view the world through. It’s definitely incomplete. But it’s one part of the puzzle of human behavior. Here are some behaviorism concepts that I think everyone should understand. 

 

Reinforcement vs. Punishment: Reinforcement is something that makes a behavior more likely. Punishment is something that makes a behavior less likely. You cannot know if something is reinforcing or punishing until you see the effect it has on the person’s behavior.

 ReinforcementPunishment
PositiveGetting your paycheck makes you more likely to do workYour teacher gives you extra homework because you did not submit your homework on time
NegativeThe loud, annoying sound your car makes when you forget to turn on your seat belt makes you more likely to put on your seat belt so the sound will stopYour teacher makes you stay in during recess because you were talking during class
 

 

Functions of Behavior: This is incomplete and doesn’t capture everything. But it’s a useful heuristic. There are four well established functions of behavior and one that is less well established and needs more research. A side note for programmers, the term function here is being used to mean the return type of a function. The well-established functions are attention, tangibles, escape/avoidant, and automatic (sensory). Attention is getting to connect with people. Tangibles is items or activities, such as food, rock climbing, hiking, and information. Escape/avoidant are quite similar but have an important distinction. Escape is leaving an aversive situation such as going inside during a thunderstorm so you get out of the rain. Avoidant is preventing an aversive situation from happening, such as going inside when you see dark clouds forming so you don’t get wet. Automatic is a bit more complicated to explain. But I think of it as your body craving sensory input, such as moving when you feel antsy. (This one I feel may just be an internal form of escape). The less established function is called the mands function, and it’s about control. From my understanding, either over your environment, yourself, or others. Think of the feeling of not wanting anyone else to tell you what to do, or when a young child asserts their independence.

 

Task Analysis: I remember in fourth grade my teacher brought in a jar of peanut butter, a loaf of bread, and a knife and asked us to teach her how to make a peanut butter sandwich. “Put the peanut butter on the bread”, we said. She picked up the jar of peanut butter and put it on the bread. “No”, we said, “Take out a piece of bread and then put the peanut butter on it”. She took out a piece of bread and then placed the jar of peanut butter on the bread. This went on for a while as we realized that we had to be very specific and detailed about our instructions. That’s called task analysis. Systematically breaking a task into specific, small, and detailed steps.

 

Extinction: This is when you take a behavior that was previously reinforced and no longer reinforce it. Sometimes a behavior is less than ideal in a particular situation. Sometimes a behavior served an important function in the past, but you’re trying to meet that function with other behaviors because this behavior has drawbacks. That’s where extinction comes in.

Planned Ignoring: Sometimes I’d make a comment to my ex-boyfriend that was specifically to aimed to make him slightly annoyed (Like I said, I’m incredibly motivated by attention). And he’d respond with something like “Yeah, I’m not going to dignify that with a response”. You just did. By saying you’re not going to respond, you gave me attention. There’s a big difference between ignoring a behavior and naming that you’re going to ignore a behavior. To be clear, there’s absolutely a place for naming how you feel about what the person did and talking about that. What I’m trying to point out is that while that absolutely has a place, it’s not ignoring the behavior.

Extinction Burst: Sometimes, when you put a behavior on extinction, at first, your brain tries harder to get it. “Wait, this always used to work, why won’t it work now? Let’s try even harder”. This is normal and expected. And after the burst, the behavior decreases.

 

Mand vs. Tact: There are many uses to language, and in conversation, we go between them quite fluently and easily, but you can look at them independently and discretely. Mands are when you ask for something you want, tacts are when you label something in the environment or your mind (and intraverbals are when you answer questions).

 

Shaping: There’s an old story I heard. I’m not sure if it’s truth, fiction, or embellished, but it explains shaping well. There was a psychology professor who was teaching his class about behaviorism. And after class, the students got together and decided to try it on their professor. They decided that by the end of the semester, they wanted the professor to be teaching from the front left corner while facing the wall. The students started by paying more attention whenever the professor walked towards the front left side of the room. And once he was consistently staying in that area of the room, they started to pay more attention whenever he walked towards the corner of that area. And so on. By the end of the semester, he was lecturing from the front left corner of the room. That’s shaping. It’s reinforcing closer and closer approximations to the desired behavior.

 

Differential Reinforcement: This is when someone gets different levels reinforcement for different levels of behavior. Let’s say I want to be a comedian and I go perform at a comedy club. And I prepare ahead of time a bunch of different jokes. The audience will laugh some for funny jokes, a lot for really funny jokes, a little for slightly funny jokes, and not at all for stupid jokes. I am being differentially reinforced by the audience’s laughter.

 

Fixed vs. Variable Reinforcement Schedules: This is when I explain why slot machines are so addictive. There are two ways temporally something can be reinforced. Well four, really. But two are a subset of the other two. A fixed reinforcement schedule is when you get reinforcement after a set number of things or amount of time. A variable reinforcement schedule is when you get reinforcement after some average number of things or amount of time.

 VariableFixed
IntervalYour friend responds to a message you sent themYou get your paycheck after a certain amount of time
RatioSlot machinesA vending machine

 

Prompting: A prompt is basically just something that signals what the correct response or desired behavior is. When you put something on your calendar and you get a reminder email about it, that’s a prompt. The desired behavior is attending the meeting or event. And the reminder email is a signal that you should do that behavior. Obviously there can be more intrusive (bigger) and less intrusive (smaller) prompts. Let’s go back to the example of the meeting. A more intrusive prompt might be a friend calling you the day of and reminding you. A less intrusive prompt might be a “save the date” card attached to your refrigerator.

 

Chaining: Think back to task analysis. We’ve got this list of steps. Now what? What do we do with it? Imagine a chain. And each step in the task is a link on the chain. The goal is to slowly add links to your chain until you have the full chain. Let’s say I have a goal of reading one hour a day. I could start by reading for five minutes a day, and when I can consistently do that, I can increase to 10 minutes. Then to 15 minutes, and so on until I have reached my goal.

Thanks to @KWolff [LW · GW] for help editing. 

1 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Phineasgage · 2023-03-27T05:02:35.549Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Quality article. Always looking for quality behaviorism posts.