Volunteer needed to change the front page 'Featured Articles' each week

post by lukeprog · 2011-10-06T02:10:03.583Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 9 comments

Less Wrong needs a volunteer to change the 'Featured Articles' once a week. I have detailed instructions on what to do (which wiki entry to edit, which articles have already been featured, which articles to feature in the future, etc.) I've been doing it so far, but not changing it as often as it should be changed. It takes about 5 minutes each time you do it.

Who is willing to do this?

9 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by shminux · 2011-10-06T02:56:43.682Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Sounds like something to automate.

Replies from: MinibearRex
comment by MinibearRex · 2011-10-06T03:22:56.309Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Is that something you're capable of doing?

Replies from: shminux
comment by shminux · 2011-10-06T04:56:46.414Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

For someone familiar with the environment, setting up a weekly cron job that follows the algorithm defined by Luke (something like: go through the articles to be featured, find four least recently featured (or four at random from 20 LRFs, or whatever), update the Featured Articles entry) should be a no-brainer. My area of expertise is software design and embedded C programming, not web stuff, so someone else would have to do it.

Replies from: Vladimir_Nesov
comment by Vladimir_Nesov · 2011-10-06T07:45:00.315Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

You could write a script that generates next week's wiki page source.

comment by Costanza · 2011-10-06T15:28:23.665Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

De-lurking to volunteer, if it actually requires some human judgment.

Replies from: lukeprog
comment by lukeprog · 2011-10-06T19:05:15.266Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Great! Will you please write me at lukeprog AT gmail?

Replies from: pedanterrific
comment by pedanterrific · 2011-10-06T19:24:23.877Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

lukerpog AT gmail

Er.

Replies from: lukeprog
comment by lukeprog · 2011-10-08T16:14:09.074Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Oops, fixed.

I wonder what percentage of my Less Wrong comments basically just say "Oops, fixed." :)

Replies from: Solvent
comment by Solvent · 2011-10-09T10:57:59.957Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I checked. A fairly low proportion.

(Control-F for "fixed" and "oops" at http://www.ibiblio.org/weidai/lesswrong_user.php?u=lukeprog )