Improving Mathematical Reasoning with-Process Supervision

post by p.b. · 2023-05-31T19:00:31.352Z · LW · GW · 3 comments

This is a link post for https://openai.com/research/improving-mathematical-reasoning-with-process-supervision

Contents

  Alignment impact
None
3 comments

Alignment impact

Process supervision has several alignment advantages over outcome supervision. It directly rewards the model for following an aligned chain-of-thought, since each step in the process receives precise supervision. Process supervision is also more likely to produce interpretable reasoning, since it encourages the model to follow a human-approved process. In contrast, outcome supervision may reward an unaligned process, and it is generally harder to scrutinize.

In some cases, safer methods for AI systems can lead to reduced performance³, a cost which is known as an alignment tax. In general, any alignment tax may hinder the adoption of alignment methods, due to pressure to deploy the most capable model. Our results below show that process supervision in fact incurs a negative alignment tax, at least in the math domain. This could increase the adoption of process supervision, which we believe would have positive alignment side-effects.

 

Paper here.

Related Prediction Market.

3 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.