[SEQ RERUN] The Logical Fallacy of Generalizing from Fictional Evidence

post by MinibearRex · 2011-09-28T03:33:31.639Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 0 comments

Today's post, The Logical Fallacy of Generalization from Fictional Evidence was originally published on 16 October 2007. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):

 

The Logical Fallacy of Generalization from Fictional Evidence consists in drawing the real-world conclusions based on statements invented and selected for the purpose of writing fiction. The data set is not at all representative of the real world, and in particular of whatever real-world phenomenon you need to understand to answer your real-world question. Considering this data set leads to an inadequate model, and inadequate answers.

Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).

This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was How to Seem (and Be) Deep, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.

Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.