8 PRIME IDENTITIES - An analisis

post by P. João (gabriel-brito) · 2025-04-17T11:36:54.678Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

Contents

    What is this about?
  1. NAMES, TOTEMS, AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS
  3. HUMAN FUNCTIONS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION
  2. 8 SUBVECTORS (8 identities)
  4. 3 LEVELS OF QUESTIONS
  5. INITIAL KEY QUESTION
  6. THE MEGA-VECTOR: INFORMATIONAL EFFICIENCY
  CONCLUSION
  REFERENCES
None
No comments

What is this about?

This project seeks to reduce the cognitive complexity involved in self-evaluating moments, goals, habits, and tasks among incarcerated individuals. I propose a discontinuous self-assessment system grounded in a model of eight intersecting identities.

With some parameters he has thus defined probabilistic identities, one can formulate questions for special moments in life to help organize events, routines, and tasks. 

This approach approaches the atomic model where, even if we cannot precisely pinpoint an electron’s layer, through specific questions we can predict which area our focus lies in.

The apparent dichotomy serves as an analytical tool rather than an absolute division. In practice, these categories merge.

---

1. NAMES, TOTEMS, AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS

• Insects and cool colors for x “indoor” identities (interior metaphors)
• Animals and warm colors for y “outdoor” identities (exterior metaphors)

---

3. HUMAN FUNCTIONS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION

He starts from the universal objective of combining useful information. He decomposes this “mega-vector” into x/y (input/output) and four areas:

1. Elemental (genes ↔ environment)
2. Individual (personal memory ↔ environment)
3. Informational (memory ↔ memory)
4. Social (informational ↔ collaboration)

Each area generates two SubVectors: input focus (x) and output focus (y), totaling eight vectors.

 

---

2. 8 SUBVECTORS (8 identities)

Each identity and relationship with a human function in random order combining information.

 

Relationship to evolutionary psychology:

Each subvector aligns with adaptive modules that evolved to process useful information in different contexts (nutrition, defense, social cooperation, etc.).

 

---

4. 3 LEVELS OF QUESTIONS

For any activity, we ask:

1. Informational vs. Social
   • When sharing information, am I generating ideas for myself or collaborating with others?
   • Example: Writing in a journal vs. discussing a project with a team.

1. Individual vs. Informational
   • Within the personal domain, am I reviewing my memories or applying what I know?
   • Example: creating art vs. solving a problem.

1. Elemental vs. Individual
   • Am I working with basic, shared processes or with unique personal experiences?
   • Example: Hunt vs. creating art.

 

---

5. INITIAL KEY QUESTION

How do we decompose our mega-vector?

• x and y (Internal vs. External)
  • Are you changing yourself or the environment?
  • Example: Eating (internal) vs. Hunting (external).

 

---

6. THE MEGA-VECTOR: INFORMATIONAL EFFICIENCY

• MaxEnt principle: we aim to maximize useful information within our own limits (time, energy).
• Objective: ask simple questions to focus on what really matters and improve our informational capacity.

---

CONCLUSION

We often encounter complex systems (e.g., learning) that cannot be understood simply by examining their parts. This framework uses information theory to provide 4 simple questions for examining our own thinking and behavior.

A linear detailed construction in:

8-probabilistic-skills-a-construction-from-maxent [LW · GW]

A specific more application in:

estimat-8-identities [LW · GW]

gamify-life-from-bayesianmind [LW · GW]

Your feedback is welcome!
If you have suggestions, critiques, or experiences to share, feel free to comment publicly or send me a private message. Every perspective helps refine the tool and make it more useful.

---

REFERENCES

• Inspired by Jaynes’ Maximum Entropy and subsequent work on information in biology and cognition.

• Framework source: P. João’s LessWrong post.

   

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.