Loleliezers

post by dclayh · 2010-04-01T04:04:27.480Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 13 comments

Previously: Eliezer Yudkowsky facts, and Kevin's prediction.

 

A bit of silliness for the day.  Below the fold to spare those with delicate sensibilities. 

 

 

 

Please contribute your own in the comments.  (Lolrobinhansons, etc., would also be welcome.)  Unfortunately I have no special source of Eliezer photos to offer beyond Google Images.

 

13 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by CharlieSheen · 2011-07-17T20:20:32.015Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Gather round LWers I bring NEW LULZ!

I've PMed GLaDOS so she can come pick up her karma for launching this madness and post the originals here but till she responds, I give you:

Overcoming Bias Guy

Frustrated LessWrong Guy

Exploitable!

Replies from: GLaDOS, MarkusRamikin
↑ comment by GLaDOS · 2011-07-17T21:13:22.852Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Karma miner reporting for duty.

Silliness was caused by this comment in this thread.

Original Overcoming Bias guy.

Original Frustrated LessWrong guy

↑ comment by MarkusRamikin · 2012-04-01T18:02:45.880Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Nice. The one about +5 karma had me laughing out loud.

comment by Peter_de_Blanc · 2010-04-01T05:40:57.198Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

There's actually a web site for this stuff.

Replies from: Liron, Liron
↑ comment by Liron · 2010-04-01T07:19:58.228Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Here is another web site for this stuff

↑ comment by Liron · 2010-04-01T07:20:20.685Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Here is another web site for this stuff.

comment by ata · 2010-04-05T02:42:05.264Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Here, have a pun.

comment by Kevin · 2010-04-01T06:17:04.398Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Nice. I don't think anyone took my bet though, it was pretty much a sure thing for me. :)

Replies from: Jack
↑ comment by Jack · 2010-04-01T08:10:59.685Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'm still hoping it gets voted down and no one participates.

I actually came by hoping some regular was going to announce their conversion to scientology. Disappointing April Fool's thread.

ETA: I'm really not against having fun, but this...

Replies from: MarkusRamikin
↑ comment by MarkusRamikin · 2012-04-01T18:06:18.275Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I feel you, but I don't think we can push the toothpaste back into the tube at this point.

What I hope for (which btw seems likely) is that this particular brand of silliness remains contained in this particular thread. If someone starts posting "Month X image macro Thread" every month or two I'm quitting. ;)

comment by Kevin · 2010-04-01T06:20:41.858Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Before this gets out of hand, I would like to remind potential commenters of the existence of the Meta Thread.

comment by CannibalSmith · 2010-04-01T10:29:00.783Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Come on, guys, we can do better than image macros.

Replies from: RobertLumley
↑ comment by RobertLumley · 2012-04-01T17:21:12.787Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

False. Nothing can ever be better than this thread.