Trying to make politics less irrational by cognitive bias-checking the US presidential debates
post by Gleb_Tsipursky · 2016-10-22T02:32:46.626Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 2 commentsThis is a link post for https://theconversation.com/fact-checking-clinton-and-trump-is-not-enough-67506
2 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by Gleb_Tsipursky · 2016-10-30T22:53:58.180Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I was invited on a radio show to talk further about this piece: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNXw6ifqcNg
A number of other venues republished this piece as well, showing general interest in making politics less irrational:
Salon
Fact-checking doesn’t matter: Human biases control whether or not we’re going to believe politicians
The Dallas Morning News in Dallas, Texas
It's not what Trump and Clinton say, but how they say it
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2016/10/24/trup-clinton-say-say
Psychology Today
How Our Biases Cause Us To Misinterpret Politics
The Huffington Post
Fact-Checking Clinton And Trump Is Not Enough
Patheos
How Our Thinking Errors Cause Us To Misinterpret Politics
Globe Gazette in Mason City, Iowa
How thinking errors affect our views of candidates' statements
The Daily World in Aberdeen, Washington
How thinking errors affect our views of candidates’ statements
The Intelligencer / Wheeling News-Register in Doylestown, Pennsylvania
How thinking errors affect our views of candidates' statements
comment by Soothsilver · 2016-10-22T17:59:21.416Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I really liked this article!