[SEQ RERUN] Is Molecular Nanotechnology "Scientific"?

post by MinibearRex · 2011-07-28T03:36:55.048Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 0 comments

Contents

No comments

Title: [SEQ RERUN] Is Molecular Nanotechnology "Scientific"? Tags: sequence_reruns Today's post, Is Molecular Nanotechnology "Scientific"? was originally published on 20 August 2007. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):

The belief that nanotechnology is possible is based on qualitative reasoning from scientific knowledge. But such a belief is merely rational. It will not be scientific until someone constructs a nanofactory. Yet if you claim that nanomachines are impossible because they have never been seen before, you are being irrational. To think that everything that is not science is pseudoscience is a severe mistake.


Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).

This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Scientific Evidence, Legal Evidence, Rational Evidence, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.

Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.