What's keeping concerned capabilities gain researchers from leaving the field?

post by sovran · 2022-05-12T12:16:00.630Z · LW · GW · No comments

This is a question post.

Contents

  Answers
    6 Lorenzo Rex
None
No comments

My guess is that there are at least a few capabilities gain researchers who're concerned about the impact their work will have. My guess is that at least a few of these would like to leave, but haven't. 

My question is: where are these people? What's stopping them from leaving? And how can I help?

My suspicion is that a lot of work can be done to simply help people leave the field. In principle: a low friction scholarship can be presented on a silver platter to those wanting to transition away. Potentially useful information, and personalised support can be provided to help people interested in leaving. (AI safety support is trying to work with those interested in entering AI safety; something like that, but for leaving capabilities gain.) A simple conversation can be started, which may prompt people to address that voice of concern in the corner of their mind more head on. 

 

There is a lot of uncertainty about what low hanging fruit exist in simply helping researchers leave. Whether these fruit exist at all. How many. Are they poisonous. 

 

The first step in resolving this uncertainty is to just look for some concerned researchers, and talk to them. 

 

So, dear concerned capabilities gain researcher. 

What's keeping you from leaving? 

(DM me if you wish for privacy)

Answers

answer by lorepieri (Lorenzo Rex) · 2022-05-13T08:47:47.902Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

If they leave then only who does not care remains... 

comment by sovran · 2022-05-13T13:52:06.738Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Not everyone concerned about safety is looking to leave. The concerned have three options: stay and try to steer towards safety, continue moving on the current trajectory, or just leave. Helping some of those who’ve changed their mind about capabilities gain actually get out is only a net negative if those people staying in the field would’ve changed the trajectory of the field. I simply don’t think that everyone should try help by staying and trying to change. There is absolutely room for people to help by just leaving, and reducing the amount of work going into capabilities gain. Different paths will make sense for different people. There’s space to support both those researchers who’re trying to steer towards safety, and those who just want out. I’ve seen a lot of work towards the former, but almost none towards the latter. I want to speak to concerned researchers so that I can begin to better understand which individual researchers should indeed just leave, and which should stay.

I really don’t think the problem is overdetermined.

Replies from: lorenzo-rex
comment by lorepieri (lorenzo-rex) · 2022-05-16T11:15:19.049Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

What's stopping the companies from hiring a new researcher? People are queueing for tech jobs.

Replies from: sovran
comment by sovran · 2022-05-17T02:35:58.665Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Researchers aren't exactly fungible; replacing a skilled researcher with a new hire would still slow down progress. given how many people want to help, but have no idea how to help, this is a gap in the market worth filling. 

No comments

Comments sorted by top scores.