Empirical Insights into Feature Geometry in Sparse Autoencoders

post by Jason Boxi Zhang (jason-boxi-zhang) · 2025-01-24T19:02:19.167Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

Contents

  Key Findings:
  An Intuitive Introduction to Sparse Autoencoders
    What are Sparse Autoencoders, and How Do They Work? 
    Overview of Vector & Feature Geometry
  Project Motivations
  Experimental Setup
    Finding Semantically Opposite Features
      Semantically Opposite Features: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
    Evaluating Feature Geometry
    Control Experiments
      Baseline Comparison with Random Features
      Comprehensive Feature Space Analysis 
      Validation Through Self-Similarity Analysis 
    Auxiliary Experiment: Compositional Model Steering
  Results
    Cosine Similarity of Semantically Opposite Features
      Decoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
      Encoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
      Decoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
      Encoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
    Features Showing Optimized Cosine Similarity
      Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
      Most Opposite Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
      Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
      Most Opposite Cosine Similarities: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
    Cosine Similarity of Corresponding Encoder-Decoder Features
      Same Feature Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
    Steering Results
      Contrastive Steering Results:
      Compositional Steering Results
      Control Steering Results: Happy and Sad Single Injection
  Conclusions and Discussion
    Acknowledgements
  Appendix
    Semantically Opposite Features: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
    Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
    Most Opposite Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10
    Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
    Most Opposite Cosine Similarities: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20
None
No comments

Key Findings:

  1. We demonstrate that subspaces with semantically opposite meanings within the GemmaScope series of Sparse Autoencoders are not pointing towards opposite directions.
  2. Furthermore, subspaces that are pointing towards opposite directions are usually not semantically related.
  3. As a set of auxiliary experiments, we experiment with the compositional injection of steering vectors (ex: -1*happy + sad) and find moderate signals of success.

An Intuitive Introduction to Sparse Autoencoders

What are Sparse Autoencoders, and How Do They Work? 

High Level Diagram Showcasing SAE Workflow: taken from Adam Karvonen's Blog Post.

Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) is a dictionary learning method with the goal of learning monosemantic subspaces that map to high-level concepts (1). Several frontier AI labs have recently applied SAEs to interpret model internals and control model generations, yielding promising results (23). 

To build an intuitive understanding of this process, we can break down the SAE workflow as follows:

The learned features encoded in the columns and rows of the SAE encoder and decoder matrices carry significant semantic weight. In this post, we explore the geometric relationships between these feature vectors, particularly focusing on semantically opposite features (antonyms), to determine whether they exhibit meaningful geometric/directional relationships similar to those observed with embedded tokens/words in Language Models (4).

Overview of Vector & Feature Geometry

One of the most elegant and famous phenomena within LMs is the geometric relationships between a LM's word embeddings. We all know the equation "king - man + woman = queen" to come out of embedding algorithms like GloVe (5) and word2vec (6). We also find that these embedding algorithms perform well in benchmarks like the WordSim-353 in matching human ratings of word-pair similarity within the cosine similarity of their embeddings (7). 

Project Motivations

Since the encoding step of the SAE workflow is analogous to taking the cosine similarity between the input activation with all learned features in the encoder matrix, we should expect the learned features of the SAE encoder and decoder weights to carry similar geometric relationships to their embeddings. In this post, we explore this hypothesis, particularly focusing on semantically opposite features (antonyms) and their cosine similarities to determine whether or not they exhibit meaningful geometric relationships similar to those observed with embedded tokens/words in LMs.

Experimental Setup

Finding Semantically Opposite Features

Neuronpedia's GemmaScope feature search function. Search for features yourself here.

To investigate feature geometry relationships, we identify 20 pairs of semantically opposite ("antonym") features from the explanations file of gemma-scope-2b-pt-res. We find these features for SAEs in the gemma-scope-2b-pt-res SAE family corresponding to layer 10 and 20. For comprehensiveness, we included all semantically similar features when multiple instances occurred in the feature space. The selected antonym pairs and their corresponding feature indices are as follows: 

Semantically Opposite Features: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Concept PairFeature A (indices)Feature B (indices)
1. Happiness-SadnessHappiness (5444, 11485, 12622, 13487, 15674) Sadness (6381, 9071) 
2. SentimentPositive (14655, 15267, 11, 579, 1715, 2243) Negative (1500, 1218, 1495, 5633, 5817)
3. UniquenessUnique: (5283, 3566, 1688) General: (11216)
4. TranquilityCalm (7509, 13614) Anxious (11961, 1954, 5997) 
5. EngagementExcitement (2864) Boredom (1618) 
6. Max-MinMaximum (423) Minimum (5602, 5950, 11484) 
7. SizeLarge (5799, 4564, 16320, 14778) Small (8021, 7283, 4110, 2266) 
8. UnderstandingClarity/Comprehension (1737, 13638)Confusion (2824, 117, 12137, 11420) 
9. PaceSpeed (13936, 6974, 2050) Slowness (11625)
10. OutcomeSuccess (8490, 745, 810) Failure (5633, 791, 6632)
11. DistributionUniform (9252) Varied (3193)
12. LuminanceBright (9852)Dark (2778) 
13. PermanenceTemporary (2998, 10715) Permanence (2029) 
14. RandomnessSystematic (9258) Random (992, 4237) 
15. FrequencyFrequent (15474) Infrequent (12633) 
16. AccuracyCorrect (10821, 12220, 12323, 13305)Incorrect (7789) 
17. ScopeLocal (3187, 3222, 7744, 15804, 14044) Global (3799, 4955, 10315) 
18. ComplexitySimple (4795, 13468, 15306, 8190) Complex (4260, 11271, 11624, 13161) 
19. ProcessingSequential (4605, 2753) Parallel (3734)
20. ConnectionConnected (10989) Isolated (9069) 

We also conduct the same experiments for Layer 20 of gemma-scope-2b-pt-res. For the sake of concision, the feature indices we use for those layers can be found in the appendix. 

Evaluating Feature Geometry

Cosine Similarity – LearnDataSci
Cosine similarity in a nutshell. Source: Fatih Karabiber

To analyze the geometric relationships between semantically opposite features, we compute their cosine similarities. This measure quantifies the directional alignment between feature vectors, yielding values in the range [-1, 1], where:

Given that certain semantic concepts are represented by multiple feature vectors, we conduct the following comparison approach:

  1. For each antonym pair, we computed cosine similarities between all possible combinations of their respective feature vectors
  2. We record both the maximum and minimum cosine similarity observed, along with their feature indices and explanations. The average cosine similarity os all 20 features is also recorded.
  3. This analysis was performed independently on both the encoder matrix columns and decoder matrix rows to evaluate geometric relationships in both spaces. 

Control Experiments

To establish statistical significance and validate our findings, we implemented several control experiments:

Baseline Comparison with Random Features

To contextualize our results, we generated a baseline distribution of cosine similarities using 20 randomly selected feature pairs. This random baseline enables us to assess whether the geometric relationships observed between antonym pairs differ significantly from chance alignments. As done with the semantically opposite features, we record the maximum and minimum cosine similarity values as well as the mean sampled cosine similarity. 

Comprehensive Feature Space Analysis 

To establish the bounds of possible geometric relationships within our feature space, we conducted an optimized exhaustive search across all feature combinations in both the encoder and decoder matrices. This analysis identifies:

  1. Maximally aligned feature pairs and their explanations (highest positive cosine similarity)
  2. Maximally opposed feature pairs and their explanations (highest negative cosine similarity)

This comprehensive control framework enables us to establish a full range of possible geometric relationships within our feature space, as well as understand the semantic relationships between maximally aligned and opposed feature pairs in the feature space. 

Validation Through Self-Similarity Analysis 

As a validation measure, we computed self-similarity scores by calculating the cosine similarity between corresponding features in the encoder and decoder matrices. This analysis serves as a positive control, verifying our methodology's ability to detect strong geometric relationships where they are expected to exist.

Auxiliary Experiment: Compositional Model Steering

As an auxiliary experiment, we experiment with the effectiveness of compositional steering approaches using SAE feature weights. We accomplish this by injecting 2 semantically opposite features from the Decoder weights of GemmaScope 2b Layer 20 during model generation to explore effects on model output sentiment.

We employ the following compositional steering injection techniques using pyvene’s (8) SAE steering intervention workflow in response to the prompt “How are you?”: 

  1. Contrastive Injection: Semantically opposite features “Happy” (11697) and “Sad” (15539) were injected together to see if they “cancelled” each other out.
  2. Compositional Injection: Semantically opposite features “Happy” and “Sad” injected but with one of them flipped. Ex: -1 * “Happy” + “Sad” or “Happy” + -1 * “Sad” compositional injections were tested to see if they would produce pronounced steering effects towards “Extra Sad” or “Extra Happy”, respectively.
  3. Control: As a control, we generate baseline examples with no steering, and single feature injection steering (Ex: Only steering with “Happy” or “Sad”). These results are used to ground sentiment measurement. 

We evaluate these injection techniques using a GPT-4o automatic labeller conditioned on few-shot examples of baseline (non-steered) examples of model responses to “How are you?” for grounding. We generate and label 20 responses for each steering approach and ask the model to compare the sentiment of steered examples against control responses.

Results

Cosine Similarity of Semantically Opposite Features

Our analysis reveals that semantically opposite feature pairs do not exhibit consistently strong geometric opposition in either the encoder or decoder matrices. While some semantically related features exhibit outlier cosine similarity, this effect isn't at all consistent. In fact, average cosine similarity hovers closely around random distributions. 

Decoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeature PairSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.00111  
Strongest Alignment0.29599[13487, 6381]Happy-Sad
Strongest Opposition-0.11335[9852, 2778]Bright-Dark
Average (Random Pairs)0.01382  
Strongest Alignment0.06732[5394, 3287]Compositional Structures-Father Figures
Strongest Opposition-0.05583[11262, 11530]Mathematical Equations - Numerical Values

Encoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeature PairSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.01797  
Strongest Alignment0.09831[16320, 8021]Large-Small
Strongest Opposition-0.0839[9852, 2778]Bright-Dark
Average (Random Pairs)0.01297  
Strongest Alignment0.06861[8166, 13589]User Interaction - Mathematical Notation
Strongest Opposition-0.03626[5394, 3287]Compositional Structure - Father Figures

Decoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeature PairSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.04243  
Strongest Alignment0.49190[11341, 14821]Day-Night
Strongest Opposition-0.07435[15216, 2604]Positive-Negative
Average (Random Pairs)-0.00691  
Strongest Alignment0.02653[2388, 13827]Programming Terminology - Personal Relationships
Strongest Opposition-0.03561[5438, 11079]Legal Documents - Chemical Formuations

Encoder Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeature PairSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.03161  
Strongest Alignment0.15184[10977, 12238]Bright-Dark
Strongest Opposition-0.07435[15216, 2604]Positive-Negative
Average (Random Pairs)0.02110  
Strongest Alignment0.09849[3198, 6944]Cheese Dishes - Cooking
Strongest Opposition-0.03588[5438, 11079]Legal Documents - Chemical Formulations

To view the exact feature explanations for index pairs shown, one can reference Neuronpedia's Gemma-2-2B page for feature lookup by model layer.

Features Showing Optimized Cosine Similarity

As another control experiment, we perform an optimized exhaustive search throughout all of the Decoder feature space to find the maximally and minimally aligned features to examine what the most opposite and aligned features look like. 

From analyzing the features found, we find there to be a lack of consistent semantic relationships between maximally and minimally aligned features in the decoder space. While there do exist a select few semantically related concepts, specifically in features that are maximally aligned, we find they do not appear consistently. We find consistent semantic misalignment in opposite pointing features. Below are the results (for the sake of formatting we only include the three most aligned features. The complete lists are featured in the appendix): 

Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
0.92281680212291

6802: phrases related to weather and outdoor conditions

12291: scientific terminology and data analysis concepts

0.89868242627912426: modal verbs and phrases indicating possibility or capability
2791:  references to Java interfaces and their implementations
0.89313118881508311888:  words related to medical terms and conditions, particularly in the context of diagnosis and treatment
15083: phrases indicating specific points in time or context

Most Opposite Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
-0.99077404373574043: references to "Great" as part of phrases or titles
7357: questions and conversions related to measurements and quantities
-0.962443571162003571: instances of sports-related injuries
16200: concepts related to celestial bodies and their influence on life experiences
-0.927887195112367195: technical terms and acronyms related to veterinary studies and methodologies
11236: Java programming language constructs and operations related to thread management

Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations
0.92429117631503611763: concepts related to methods and technologies in research or analysis
15036: programming constructs related to thread handling and GUI components
 0.829108581145378581: instances of the word "the"
14537: repeated occurrences of the word "the" in various contexts
0.82147491463364914: programming-related keywords and terms
6336: terms related to legal and criminal proceedings

Most Opposite Cosine Similarities: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
-0.99212663186846631: the beginning of a text or important markers in a document
8684:  technical jargon and programming-related terms
-0.98955505283665052: the beginning of a document or section, likely signaling the start of significant content
8366: verbs and their related forms, often related to medical or technical contexts
-0.975207436793743:  proper nouns and specific terms related to people or entities
6793: elements that resemble structured data or identifiers, likely in a list or JSON format

Cosine Similarity of Corresponding Encoder-Decoder Features

To ensure significant geometric relationships exist between features in SAEs, we perform a control experiment in which we compute the cosine similarities between corresponding features in the encoder and decoder matrix (i.e. computing the cosine similarity for the feature "hot" in the encoder matrix with the "hot" feature in the decoder matrix). 

We perform these experiments for every single semantically opposite and random feature with itself, and report the averages below. As seen, significant cosine similarities exist for correspondent features, highlighting the weakness between cosine similarities between semantically opposite features as seen above. 

Same Feature Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeatureSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.71861  
Highest Similarity0.885424605Sequential Processing
Lowest Similarity0.477226381Sadness
Average (Random Pairs)0.72692  
Highest Similarity0.850931146Words related to "Sequences"
Lowest Similarity0.511456266Numerical data related to dates

Same Feature Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Relationship TypeCosine SimilarityFeatureSemantic Concept
Average (Antonym Pairs)0.75801  
Highest Similarity0.868705657Correctness
Lowest Similarity0.5649310108Confusion
Average (Random Pairs)0.74233  
Highest Similarity0.9156613137Coding related terminology
Lowest Similarity0.5535212591The presence of beginning markers in text

Steering Results

We receive mixed results when evaluating compositional systems. Our results suggest that compositional injection (-1 * "Happy" + "Sad") results in higher steered sentiment towards the positive feature’s direction, and flipping the direction of SAE features results in neutral steering on its own. 

Synchronized injection of antonymic features (happy + sad) seem to suggest some “cancelling out” of sentiment, control single injection directions like sadness seem to become much less common when paired with a happy vector. 

Overall, compositionality of features provides interesting results and presents the opportunity for future research to be done. 

Contrastive Steering Results:

Happy + Sad Injection
Net:Neutral (11/20)
Happy Steering:5
Sad Steering: 2
No Steering:11
Happy to Sad Steering: 1
Sad to Happy Steering: 1

Compositional Steering Results

 -1 * Happy + Sad Injection-1 * Sad + Happy Injection
Net:Sad Steered (14/20)Happy Steered (11/20)
Happy Steering:011
Sad Steering: 121
No Steering:66
Happy to Sad Steering: 21
Sad to Happy Steering: 00

Control Steering Results: Happy and Sad Single Injection

 Happy InjectionSad Injection-1 * Happy Injection-1 * Sad Injection
Net:Neutral (10/20)Sad (8/20)Neutral (15/20)Neutral (14/20)
Happy Steering:7233
Sad Steering: 0820
No Steering:1051514
Happy to Sad Steering: 2100
Sad to Happy Steering: 1403

Conclusions and Discussion

The striking absence of consistent geometric relationships between semantically opposite features is surprising, given how frequent geometric relationships occur in original embedding spaces between semantically related features. SAE features are designed to anchor layer activations to their corresponding monosemantic directions, yet seem to be almost completely unrelated in all layers of the SAE. 

Potential explanations for the lack of geometric relationships in semantically related SAE encoder and decoder features could be due to contextual noise in the training data. As word embeddings go through attention layers, their original directions could become muddled with noise from other words in the contextual window. However, the lack of any noticeable geometric relationship across 2 seperate layers is surprising. These findings lay the path for future interpretability work to be done in better understanding this phenomena. 

 

Acknowledgements

A special thanks to Zhengxuan Wu for advising me on this project!

Appendix

Semantically Opposite Features: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Concept PairFeature A (indices)Feature B (indices)
1. Happiness-SadnessHappiness (11697)Sadness (15682, 15539)
2. SentimentPositive (14588, 12049, 12660, 2184, 15216, 427)Negative (2604, 656, 1740, 3372, 5941)
3. Love-HateLove (9602, 5573)Hate (2604)
4. TranquilityCalm (813)Anxious (14092, 2125, 7523, 7769)
5. EngagementExcitement (13823, 3232)Boredom (16137)
6. IntensityIntense (11812)Mild (13261)
7. SizeLarge (582, 9414)Small (535)
8. UnderstandingClarity (3726)Confusion (16253, 3545, 10108, 16186)
9. PaceSpeed (4483, 7787, 4429)Slowness (1387)
10. OutcomeSuccess (7987, 5083, 1133, 162, 2922)Failure (10031, 2708, 15271, 8427, 3372)
11. TimingEarly (8871, 6984)Late (8032)
12. LuminanceBright (10977)Dark (12238)
13. PositionInternal (14961, 15523)External (3136, 8848, 433)
14. Time of DayDaytime (11341)Nighttime (14821)
15. DirectionPush (6174)Pull (9307)
16. AccuracyCorrect (10351, 5657)Incorrect (11983, 1397)
17. ScopeLocal (10910, 1598)Global (10472, 15416)
18. ComplexitySimple (8929, 10406, 4599)Complex (3257, 5727)
19. ProcessingSequential (5457, 4099, 14378)Parallel (4453, 3758)
20. ConnectionConnected (5539)Isolated (15334, 2729)

Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
0.92281680212291

6802: phrases related to weather and outdoor conditions

12291: scientific terminology and data analysis concepts

0.89868242627912426: modal verbs and phrases indicating possibility or capability
2791:  references to Java interfaces and their implementations
0.89313118881508311888:  words related to medical terms and conditions, particularly in the context of diagnosis and treatment
15083: phrases indicating specific points in time or context
0.88358500582915005: various punctuation marks and symbols
8291: function calls and declarations in code
0.882585898148925898: components and processes related to food preparation
14892: text related to artificial intelligence applications and methodologies in various scientific fields
0.880663384124403384: terms related to education, technology, and security
12440: code snippets and references to specific programming functions or methods in a discussion or tutorial.
0.879271838121671838: technical terms related to polymer chemistry and materials science
12167: structured data entries in a specific format, potentially related to programming or configuration settings.
0.87857122911508312291: scientific terminology and data analysis concepts
15083: phrases indicating specific points in time or context
0.87558811881448118: instances of formatting or structured text in the document
8144: names of people or entities associated with specific contexts or citations
0.872483152150833152:  references to mental health or psychosocial topics related to women
15083: phrases indicating specific points in time or context

Most Opposite Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 10

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
-0.99077404373574043: references to "Great" as part of phrases or titles
7357: questions and conversions related to measurements and quantities
-0.962443571162003571: instances of sports-related injuries
16200: concepts related to celestial bodies and their influence on life experiences
-0.949123738126893738:  mentions of countries, particularly Canada and China
12689: terms related to critical evaluation or analysis
-0.94557398647273986: terms and discussions related to sexuality and sexual behavior
4727: patterns or sequences of symbols, particularly those that are visually distinct 
-0.935631234129961234: words related to fundraising events and campaigns
12996: references to legal terms and proceedings
-0.928709295102649295: the presence of JavaScript code segments or functions
10264: text related to font specifications and styles
-0.927887195112367195: technical terms and acronyms related to veterinary studies and methodologies
11236: Java programming language constructs and operations related to thread management
-0.925764231125424231: terms related to mental states and mindfulness practices
12542: information related to special DVD or Blu-ray editions and their features
-0.92376255364182553: references to medical terminologies and anatomical aspects
6418: references to types of motor vehicles
-0.920216748375674: terms related to cooking and recipes
8375: descriptions of baseball games and players.

Most Aligned Cosine Similarity: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
0.92429117631503611763: concepts related to methods and technologies in research or analysis
15036: programming constructs related to thread handling and GUI components
 0.829108581145378581: instances of the word "the"
14537: repeated occurrences of the word "the" in various contexts
0.82147491463364914: programming-related keywords and terms
6336: terms related to legal and criminal proceedings
0.812374140162674140: programming-related syntax and logical operations
16267:  instances of mathematical or programming syntax elements such as brackets and operators
 0.8052418317248

1831: elements related to JavaScript tasks and project management

7248: structural elements and punctuation in the text

 0.77152845816090

8458:  occurrences of function and request-related terms in a programming context

16090: curly braces and parentheses in code

0.769657449101927449: the word 'to' and its variations in different contexts
10192: modal verbs indicating possibility or necessity
0.76194541386305413: punctuation and exclamatory expressions in text
8630: mentions of cute or appealing items or experiences
0.758507465106957465: phrases related to legal interpretations and political tensions involving nationality and citizenship
10695: punctuation marks and variation in sentence endings
0.748777452437

745:  sequences of numerical values

2437: patterns related to numerical information, particularly involving the number four

Most Opposite Cosine Similarities: gemma-scope-2b-pt-res Layer 20

Cosine SimilarityIndex 1Index 2Explanations: 
-0.99212663186846631: the beginning of a text or important markers in a document
8684:  technical jargon and programming-related terms
-0.98955505283665052: the beginning of a document or section, likely signaling the start of significant content
8366: verbs and their related forms, often related to medical or technical contexts
-0.975207436793743:  proper nouns and specific terms related to people or entities
6793: elements that resemble structured data or identifiers, likely in a list or JSON format
-0.97373153055331530: technical terms related to inventions and scientific descriptions
5533: terms related to medical and biological testing and analysis
-0.971171692109311692: legal and technical terminology related to statutes and inventions
10931: keywords and parameters commonly associated with programming and configuration files
-0.96775478453284784: elements of scientific or technical descriptions related to the assembly and function of devices
5328: terms and phrases related to legal and statistical decisions
-0.96136661491856614:  elements related to data structure and processing in programming contexts
9185: technical terms related to audio synthesis and electronic music equipment
-0.96027104191488110419: technical terms and specific concepts related to scientific research and modeling
14881:  phrases related to lubrication and mechanical properties
-0.95915148390641483: words related to specific actions or conditions that require attention or caution
9064: mathematical operations and variable assignments in expressions
-0.958871896151111896: elements indicative of technical or programming contexts
15111: phrases related to functionality and efficiency in systems and processes
  1. ^

     

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.