Mental Masturbation and the Intellectual Comfort Zone

post by Declan Molony (declan-molony) · 2024-05-07T05:47:05.257Z · LW · GW · 2 comments

Contents

  The psychology driving Mental Masturbation
  Why do we do this in the first place?
  How to use the concept of Mental Masturbation to prevent wasting time
None
2 comments

I have a particular problem that I like to refer to as Mental Masturbation.

Mental Masturbation: consuming information under the pretense of wanting to learn something useful, but in reality I’m “getting myself off” by indulging in subjects I’m already well-versed in.

A personal example:

The psychology driving Mental Masturbation

This concept can be better understood with how authors Robin Hanson and Kevin Simler define reasons and motives in their book The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life.

Reasons: the verbal explanations we give to account for our behavior

Motives: the underlying causes of our behavior, whether we’re conscious of them or not

Here’s an example using their definitions: 

Reason: John tells himself he uses TikTok to learn new things.

Motive: His brain found a way to justify digital dopamine hits. As I mentioned in a previous post [LW · GW]: the addicted mind will find a way to rationalize continued use at all costs.

 

Why do we do this in the first place?

As Scott Galloway states in his book The Four:

Over-collecting [for our ancestors] was a smart strategy. The only downside of too much stuff was wasted effort. [Whereas] the downside of under-collecting was death from starvation.

The behavior of over-collecting resources and information, however, is rendered counterproductive in our modern age of abundance.

 

How to use the concept of Mental Masturbation to prevent wasting time

Having already read 200+ books as an adult, the ROI is bad and getting worse. While deliberating checking out a book (which is a ~5-hour commitment) from the library, I ask: what specific problem am I having in my life right now that could be solved by this book? If a good enough rationale does not present itself beyond “it seems interesting”, then I label it as Mental Masturbation and skip it.[1]

Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. — Einstein

Applying the concept of Mental Masturbation, I reduced my reading list from 50 non-fiction books to just five, thereby saving 225 hours.[2] With the extra time, I write LessWrong posts [LW · GW] using what I’ve learned. Writing helps solidify my thinking on certain topics, rather than continually pumping more information into my already overloaded brain.

This is not about denying myself pleasure—I love to unwind at night by reading fiction. But if I want to accomplish anything significant in my lifetime, then I must be selective in what I choose to consume in the name of “learning”, lest I delude myself into being endlessly distracted by information that could be useful in the future…

  1. ^

    Not all books must be read to solve a specific problem. Reading about unfamiliar subjects to expand my worldview is still a worthy investment, in my opinion. 

  2. ^

    (50 books - 5 books) * 5 hours per book = 225 hours

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Declan Molony (declan-molony) · 2024-05-07T05:53:01.213Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Another example of Mental Masturbation I decided to exclude from the main text:

  • While playing a piano piece I already know fairly well but am lacking in one specific spot, my brain will say, “Hey, rather than painstakingly drill the 1-2 measures that are tricky, you should play the entire song through to get a balanced perspective of the piece!” To fix this, I put a sticky note on my music stand that says: “Stop Mental Masturbation and practice the hard part!”
comment by lesswronguser123 (fallcheetah7373) · 2024-05-08T10:01:54.399Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I think the hidden motives are basically rationalisation, I have found myself singlethinking those motives in the past nowadays I just bring those reasons to the centre-stage and try to actually find whether they align with my commitments instead of motivated stopping. Sometimes I just corner my motivated reasoning (bottom line) so bad (since it's not that hard to just do expected consequentialist reasoning properly for day to day stuff) that instead of my brain trying to come up with better reasoning it just makes the idea of the impulsive action more salient, some urge along the lines of "think less and intuit/act more".  

 

Also I have personally used this concept of "intellectual masturbation" to divert discussions away from potentially philosophical bomb to more relevant topics it's much better to reduce the philosophical jargon in day to day conversations lol.