Introducing Avatarism: A Rational Framework for Building actual Heaven

post by ratiba ro (ratiba-ro) · 2024-12-15T17:17:45.440Z · LW · GW · 2 comments

Contents

  A Brief Sketch of Avatarism
  Engaging with Objections
None
2 comments

People of LessWrong share a common thread: a drive to understand reality as it is, coupled with a willingness to tackle ambitious projects that push beyond current human limitations. Today, I’d like to introduce a nascent idea—“Avatarism”—that attempts to meld rationality, scientific rigor, and technological ambition into a guiding vision. 
The short version: Avatarism proposes that instead of relying on ancient metaphysical narratives to provide meaning or solace from death and injustice, we should consciously work to create a future state (a “True Heaven”) in our own actual universe—a realm of well-being and freedom from suffering, and even more outrageously resurrect past individuals into this improved state of existence. The claim is not that we know how to achieve this right now, but that we can at least start charting a course, applying the same tools of rationality, epistemic humility, and technological foresight that the LessWrong community already values.

A Brief Sketch of Avatarism

  1. Acknowledging the Void: Traditional religions often fill existential dread with unfalsifiable promises. Avatarism starts by acknowledging that no external authority is guaranteed to deliver utopia or salvation from death. We have no inherent “purpose” gifted to us; we have to craft it. Treat the most ambitious goal we can think of as a generational engineering challenge.
  2. Goal-Setting Under Uncertainty: The aim is to create a drastically better future environment, effectively a heaven on naturalistic terms. We don’t know the exact methods: maybe advanced neural engineering, virtual reality civilizations, or large-scale energy harnessing. The point is to keep the goal open-ended, allowing for rigorous updates as knowledge grows.
  3. Rational Approach to Grand Goals: Avatarism does not claim certainty. It does not hinge on miracles or suspend natural laws. Instead, it approaches the question “Can we create the future we want?” with a physics, engineering mindset. We treat it like a frontier research question. Recreating individuals from the past into an artificial heaven, extremely hard, perhaps improbable, but not obviously impossible given millions of years of scientific advancement, a blink of an eye in the mind of a dead human.
  4. Incremental and Iterative: Avatarism encourages continuous refinement. If tomorrow’s physics breakthroughs challenge a current approach, we pivot. If new understandings of consciousness emerge, we incorporate them. No dogmas, no unchangeable doctrines.

Engaging with Objections

A Friendly Invitation
Avatarism is not a demand for belief; it’s an invitation to consider and promote an ultimate goal: leveraging rationality, science, and collective wisdom to move beyond existential angst and toward a state of well-being that past generations dared only to fantasize and mythize. It could be a grand unifying narrative for rational futurists—one that stays tethered to reality, embraces uncertainty, and makes no excuses for pretending things are easy. The journey is just beginning, and I’m curious whether the LessWrong community finds value in exploring—and perhaps shaping—this conceptual frontier.

If this resonates—or if you have critiques or counter-arguments—I invite you to a discussion here or to visit the Avatarism website and share your thoughts. Your insights can help refine the vision. 

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Viliam · 2024-12-17T12:05:54.885Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

If the future is good, it will be a technical problem whether we can resurrect the dead (especially, against the second law of thermodynamics). If the future is bad, it doesn't matter what we want.

I am not sure what is there to discuss, other than how to preserve the people who are still alive (cryonics) and how to increase the probability that the future is good, which is what this website is mostly about.

Replies from: ratiba-ro
comment by ratiba ro (ratiba-ro) · 2024-12-18T23:11:40.552Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

We might agree the second law of thermodynamics does not make resurrection insurmountable, there is much is physics we don't know yet, reconstructing a person might not involve collecting their parts.

Also agreed, if the future is bad it doesn't matter what we want, but we have the power to effect the future today and in the near future, and to me it seems like embracing this framework might have a positive effect.

Avatarism can offer a goal to those of us who lost our direction when we lost religion, I sense in secular society a lack of "North Star" to aspire to, Avatarism offers this in a net good even if it would ultimately be unsuccessful.