Testing "True" Language Understanding in LLMs: A Simple Proposal

post by MtryaSam · 2024-11-02T19:12:34.691Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

Contents

  The Core Idea
  Why This Matters
  Some Initial Thoughts
    Potential Setup
    Example (Very Simplified)
  Open Questions
  Limitations
  Call for Discussion
  About Me
  Feedback Welcome
None
No comments

The Core Idea

What if we could test whether language models truly understand meaning, rather than just matching patterns? Here's a simple thought experiment:

1. Create two artificial languages (A and B) that bijectively map to the same set of basic concepts R'
2. Ensure these languages are designed independently (no parallel texts)
3. Test if an LLM can translate between them without ever seeing translations

If successful, this would suggest the model has learned to understand the underlying meanings, not just statistical patterns between languages. Theoretically, if Language A and Language B each form true mappings (MA and MB) to the same concept space R', then the model should be able to perform translation through the composition MA·MB^(-1), effectively going from Language A to concepts and then to Language B, without ever seeing parallel examples. This emergent translation capability would be a strong indicator of genuine semantic understanding, as it requires the model to have internalized the relationship between symbols and meanings in each language independently.

Why This Matters

This approach could help distinguish between:

• Surface-level pattern matching
• Genuine semantic understanding
• Internal concept representation

It's like testing if someone really understands two languages versus just memorizing a translation dictionary.

Some Initial Thoughts

Potential Setup

• Start with a small, controlled set of basic concepts (colors, numbers, simple actions)
• Design Language A with one set of rules/structure
• Design Language B with completely different rules/structure
• Both languages should map clearly to the same concepts without ambiguity

Example (Very Simplified)

Concept: "red circle"

• Language A: "zix-kol" (where "zix" = red, "kol" = circle)
• Language B: "nare-tup" (where "nare" = red, "tup" = circle)

Without ever showing the model that "zix-kol" = "nare-tup", can it figure out the translation by understanding that both phrases refer to the same concept?

Open Questions

1. How do we ensure the languages are truly independent?
2. What's the minimum concept space needed for a meaningful test?
3. How do we efficiently validate successful translations?

Limitations

As an undergraduate student outside the AI research community, I acknowledge:

• This is an initial thought experiment
• Implementation would require significant resources and expertise
• Many practical challenges would need to be addressed

Call for Discussion

I'm sharing this idea in hopes that:

• Researchers with relevant expertise might find it interesting
• It could contribute to discussions about AI understanding
• Others might develop or improve upon the concept

About Me

I'm an engineering student interested in AI understanding and alignment. While I may not have the resources to develop this idea fully, I hope sharing it might spark useful discussions or inspire more developed approaches.

Feedback Welcome

If you have thoughts, suggestions, or see potential in this idea, I'd love to hear from you. Please feel free to comment or reach out.

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.