Posts

Arch-anarchy:Theory and practice 2024-04-30T23:20:23.840Z
Arch-anarchy 2024-04-26T15:05:14.984Z
WISDOMISM A Moral Theory for the Age of Information 2024-04-19T23:06:50.824Z
The Thermodynamics of Death 2024-04-19T00:36:23.762Z
Extropy magazine review 2023-12-27T18:37:36.256Z

Comments

Comment by Peter lawless on [deleted post] 2023-07-06T14:17:51.243Z

well , about the first point , I believe in the principle of enlightened self-interest. my vision is that people are free to pursue their own individual interests and what is best for humanity.

I understand your concerns, and I admit that wisdomism is not perfect, but no moral system is perfect. If you set common sense and/or conscience aside, ANY principle can be twisted into something vile without violating it. even utilitarianism , for example, is not immune, see for example: utility monster, benevolent world exploder, and experience machine. but the fact that there is no perfect moral system does not make morality disposable.

but well i think probably for wisdomism to work it would need some kind of pragmatic rule system.

Comment by Peter lawless on [deleted post] 2023-07-05T21:58:38.494Z

for me ? Well is the moral system , more compatible with my philosophical views , I identify myself as an extreme individualist transhumanist