Offer of co-authorship

post by Vanessa Kosoy (vanessa-kosoy) · 2020-01-10T17:44:00.977Z · LW · GW · 1 comments

I am offering interested persons to become a co-author on (a revised version of) my paper "forecasting using incomplete models". The paper was rejected from the Electronic Journal of Statistics with possibility to resubmit. The main criticism of the reviewers was: not enough citations and discussion of relation to other work. The job of the collaborator would be to revise the paper in order to (i) address this concern (ii) improve the overall presentation and make it more accessible. After that, the paper will be resubmitted to EJS (and/or other publications venues, according to what we will decide together).

Naturally, I will work closely with the collaborator and review the changes ey make, but ey are expected to do the lion share of the work in the revision.

The requirements for a candidate collaborator are:

In order to apply, email me at rot13 of inarffn.xbfbl@vagryyvtrapr.bet. In your email, please share with me (i) your name (ii) your background (iii) the extent to which you are compatible with the above requirements and (iv) your motivation for applying.

1 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Pattern · 2020-01-10T19:44:21.554Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
The main criticism of the reviewers was: not enough citations and discussion of relation to other work.

I'd call this a failure mode (not valuing new work), if that weren't a useful way of operating for someone to do, if they also accepted things that are nothing but discussion of other work - specifically, distillation.