Biological humans collectively exert at most 400 gigabits/s of control over the world.
post by benwr · 2025-02-20T23:44:06.509Z · LW · GW · 1 commentsContents
1 comment
Edit: I now believe that the first paragraph of this post is (at least) not quite right. See this comment [LW(p) · GW(p)] for details.
If an agent makes one binary choice per second, no matter how smart it is, there's a sense in which it can (at best) be "narrowing world space" by a factor of two in each second, choosing the "better half" of possible worlds, from its perspective.
This is the idea behind the reinforcement learning concept of "empowerment".
People have tried to measure the information throughput of biological humans. The very highest estimates, which come from image recognition tasks, are around 50 bits per second, and most estimates are more like 10 bits per second.
There are about 8 billion living humans. Even if humanity could be perfectly modeled as a single rational agent, and all our choices were perfectly independent of each other, I think this implies that we collectively have no more than about 50 * 8 = 400 billion bits per second of control over the world.
1 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by benwr · 2025-02-20T23:50:11.150Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Nate Soares points out that the first paragraph is not quite right: Imagine writing a program that somehow implements an aligned superintelligence, giving it as an objective, "maximize utility according to the person who pressed the 'go' button", and pressing the 'go' button.
There's some sense in which, by virtue of existing in the world, you're already kind of "lucky" by this metric: It can take a finite amount of information to instantiate an agent that takes unbounded actions on your behalf.