Less Wrong Study Hall - Year 1 Retrospective
post by Error · 2014-03-18T01:54:45.308Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 30 commentsContents
A Brief History of the Hall Current MO and Social Norms Personal Reflections Survey and Results Demographics Age Country Race Sex, Gender, Relationships Sex Gender Sexual Orientation Relationship Style Number of Current Partners Relationship Goals Relationship Status Children More Children Work and Education Work Status Profession Degree Less Wrong Less Wrong Use Time in Community (LW, years) Karma Score Meetups Community (LW) Took the main LW survey? Less Wrong Study Hall Time in Community (LWSH) Frequency Time in the Hall (per visit, in minutes) Usage Usage 2 (most important) Draw Draw 2 (most important) Camera Camera Off (why?) Time Zone Temporal Habits (Weekdays) Temporal Habits (Weekends) Referrals Interaction (outside the Hall) Interaction 2 (in person only) Romance Base Akrasia (1–7 scale, 1 being no akrasia, 7 being functionally paralyzed) Akratic Impact (Akrasia in the Hall, same scale as previous) Hedonic Impact (Hedonic improvement in the Hall, 1–5, 1 being no/negative impact, 5 being large impact) Distractions (percentage) Distraction Cause Overwork (percentage) Accomplishments Accomplishment Examples Miscellaneous Feedback Social Atmosphere Suggestion Box Akrasia Akrasia Akrasia: Current Akrasia: Illness Akrasia: Medicines 1 Akrasia: Medicines 1.5 Akrasia: Medicines 2 Akrasia: Supplements 1 Akrasia: Supplements 1.5 Akrasia: Supplements 2 Akrasia: Therapy 1 Akrasia: Therapy 2 Akrasia: Meditation 1 Akrasia: Meditation 2 Akrasia: Elsewhat 1 Akrasia: Elsewhat 2 Akrasia: Communication Silliness Tinychat Hatred Tinychat Screams (number of) Stuffies Stuffies on Camera None 30 comments
Some time back, a small group of Less Wrongers collected in a video chatroom to work on…things. We’ve been at it for exactly one year as of today, and it seems like a good time to see what’s come of it.[1] So here is what we’ve done, what we’re doing, and a few thoughts on where we’re going. At the end is a survey taken of the LWSH, partly to be compared to Less Wrong proper, but mostly for fun. If you like what you see here, come join us. The password is “lw”.
A Brief History of the Hall
I think the first inspiration was Eliezer looking for someone to sit with him while he worked, to help with productivity and akrasia. Shannon Friedman answered the call and it seemed to be effective. She suggested a similar coworking scheme to one of her clients, Mqrius, to help him with akratic issues surrounding his thesis. She posted on Less Wrong about it, with the intent of connecting him and possibly others who wanted to co-work in a similar fashion. Tsakinis, in the comments, took the idea a step further, and created a Tinychat video chatroom for group working. It was titled the Less Wrong Study Hall. The theory is that it will help us actually do the work, instead of, say, reading tvtropes when we should be studying. It turned out to be a decent Schelling point, enough to form a regular group and occasionally attract new people. It’s grown slowly but steadily.
Tinychat’s software sucks, and there have been a couple of efforts to replace it. Mqrius looked into OpenMeetings, but it didn’t work out. Yours truly took a crack at programming a LWSH Google Hangout, but it ran aground on technical difficulties. Meanwhile the tinychat room continued to work, and despite nobody actually liking it, it’s done the job well enough.
Tinychat is publicly available, and there have been occasional issues with the public along the way. A few people took up modding, but it was still a nuisance. Eventually a password was placed on the room, which mostly shut down the problem. We did have one guy straight out guess the password, which was a…peculiar experience. He was notably not all there, but somehow still scrupulously polite, and left when asked. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that happen on the Internet before.
A year after the Hall opened, we have about twenty to twenty-five regulars, with an unknown number of occasional users. We’re still well within Dunbar’s number, so everybody knows everybody else and new users integrate quickly. We’ve developed a reasonably firm set of social norms to guide our work, in spite of not having direct technical control nor clear leaders.
The story thus far has been a pretty good one. I’m looking forward to Year Two.
Current MO and Social Norms
No one went out of their way to come up with these and nobody is really enforcing them, but it’s how the group currently behaves.
We adopted the Pomodoro Technique early on to organize our work. We run 32-minute pomodoros instead of the usual 25 (I have no idea how this custom originated; I'm told it was Dentin's idea though), interspersed with eight minute breaks that tend to run over as often as not. Sometimes, we’ll run a longer or shorter pomo if someone requests it. When you enter the room, ask for the current time. Usually at least one person will notice and respond with the endpoint of the current pomo, expressed in minutes-past-the-hour to be applicable across time zones.[2]
Don’t talk during pomos without good cause. Asking for the current time is good cause; so is saying a brief goodbye when you leave. If someone else is talking enough to be distracting, it’s acceptable to ask them to save it for the next break. Otherwise, insert nose in grindstone.
During breaks, talk as much as you want. Talking about what you’re working on is explicitly encouraged. Bragging about something you’ve just completed is also explicitly encouraged. In the absence of those two things, though, it’s okay to just be social.[3]
Anyone who notices that the break has ended can start the next pomo just by stating its length and end time. Usually one or two self-selected people will keep the rest of the room on track in this regard. If the break runs over and you’re the first to notice, speak up even if you don’t want to be responsible for the clock; it’s good form to cut the chitchat quickly once someone has noted that it’s time to get back to work.
Most of us keep our cameras on in the room, and I encourage new users to do the same. Having someone watch you work seems to improve motivation and reduce the temptation to slack. Your presence will be more obvious, which helps if you happen to be new and are scrolled off the bottom of the user list. It also encourages others to interact with you; socialization during breaks is easier and works better when you can see people's expressions. As noted in the survey below, that sort of social reinforcement is a big plus. In lieu of a camera, some users display their working desktop instead, but this is rare and seems to require a third party program. If you like privacy, keeping everything off is okay too; just be aware that you’re avoiding a useful tool.
Bullet point version of the above:
- Say hello and ask for the current time when entering.
- Don’t talk during pomos.
- Do talk during breaks.
- Talking about work is encouraged.
- Bragging about work is encouraged.
- Don’t turn your mic on.
- But do turn your camera or desktop view on if you want.
Personal Reflections
It’s been an interesting first year. I’m part of a tribe as it begins to cohere, and I like it.
Is it effective? Good question. I enjoy the environment but that doesn’t mean it’s succeeding at what it’s supposed to do: help akratics Get Stuff Done. I feel like it’s effective, but being sure of that is hard. I've certainly written more in the last year than the previous ten. I do use a couple of other productivity hacks, especially Beeminder, and in fact I frequently work on Beeminded tasks in the Hall. Someone (jkadlubo?) mentioned that they didn’t like Beeminder because it was all stick and no carrot. For me, the study hall is the carrot. I like working alongside other people.
We have a lot of students, which is unsurprising given that we splintered off Less Wrong and Less Wrong also has a lot of students. This makes me wonder what will happen when our users begin to graduate.
Tinychat, as a technology, sucks. Unfortunately it’s the best existing software that does what we want, by virtue of being the only existing software that does what we want (Google Hangouts, the most obvious alternative, does not work for our purposes as mentioned above), and at least two attempts to replace it have failed. I believe this is because, while Tinychat is annoying, it’s not annoying enough for anyone to put in the relatively large effort that seems to be required to replace it – especially since the room is self-selected for akratic problems in the first place. The most promising alternative tech I can find is XMPP Muji, a standard for multi-user video chat services, but the standard’s approval is deferred and I’m not sure why. A cursory Google search does not turn up any software that implements it.
One of the problems brought up when the room was first proposed was that people might end up using the Hall to socialize rather than work. The concern was justified, at least partially; we routinely run over breaks talking. But we seem to have countered that with a fairly strong norm of stopping the break as soon as someone notices. As we’ve all gotten to know each other better, the atmosphere during the breaks has become quite social. I would blame our break-overruns on this, except I’m pretty sure that has been happening since the start. Nevertheless there has been some concern that the more-social atmosphere has been distracting people from actually working. I asked about this in the survey, but the answers were heavily slanted towards “not terribly distracting.” (no higher than a 3 on a 1–5 scale, and only three 3’s) This leads me to believe that there are more people concerned that others might be bothered than there are others who are actually bothered. It is possible there is a selection effect whereby the people irritated leave and never took the survey; but the change in atmosphere has been relatively recent, and I haven’t noticed an exodus of regulars. Additionally, the single largest draw reported is social reinforcement for working. I think the social atmosphere is probably a net positive, although it would be good if we could technologically enforce break limits. Several other people noted that in the suggestion box; unfortunately it is not possible without replacing Tinychat. Which was also a common item in the suggestion box.
We’ve lost some users along the way (including the original creator, I think), but a near-majority of the room has been around since almost the beginning. That seems to suggest that people who try it out for more than a few cursory sessions stick around. We’ll begin to see if that’s the case next year, with repeat survey-takers.
Survey and Results
Yvain’s Less Wrong 2013 Survey results came out as the one year mark was approaching, and it seemed to me that it would be fun, if maybe not all that useful, to collect the same sort of information about the Hall. So, I did. The survey was open for about three weeks and publicized during Hall breaks by myself and a few other people. You can see the questions used here. I flagrantly plagiarized many of the questions from Yvain’s survey (with permission, and thank you), because it seemed like comparing the Hall to Less Wrong proper would be interesting. I took out a few sections that I didn’t feel were relevant and added a couple of Study Hall specific sections. There is also some silliness at the end.
We had 23 responses. I counted 22 unique users in the room over the period the survey was open. Assuming there are at least some people I did not see during that time (owing to differing schedules) I would guess our actual recurring population is around 30, of which perhaps 20 show up regularly. I have noticed an influx of new faces in the last week or two; I sort of wish I’d run this a month later.
With such a small population it would be fairly easy for community members to de-anonymize people. Respondents were warned of that, but I would still appreciate it if people didn’t go out of their way to try and connect responses to names.
The results are below. My comments are in brackets.
Demographics
Age
| Mean | 23.4 |
| Stddev | 4.2 |
| Min | 17 |
| 1st quartile | 20.5 |
| 2nd quartile | 23 |
| 3rd quartile | 26.5 |
| Max | 32 |
[[ Our youngest user is 17 and our oldest is 32, at least among respondents. I feel old now. ]]
Country
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 0 | 0% |
| France | 0 | 0% |
| Germany | 8 | 35% |
| Israel | 0 | 0% |
| New Zealand | 0 | 0% |
| Poland | 2 | 9% |
| Russia | 0 | 0% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
[[ I don’t know why we’re so hugely concentrated in Germany. I think it might be one cluster of people all referring each other. ]]
Race
| Asian (East Asian) | 0 | 0% |
| Asian (Indian Subcontinent) | 0 | 0% |
| Middle Eastern | 0 | 0% |
| Black | 0 | 0% |
| White (non-Hispanic) | 21 | 100% |
| White (Hispanic) | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
[[ I’m sure I’ve seen at least one non-white person…but still. ]]
Sex, Gender, Relationships
I considered not including this section as irrelevant and possibly touchy, especially given how easy it would be to de-anonymize people. Someone (I think tkadlubo) pointed out that Less Wrongers in general are interested in relationship hacking. I ended up making it optional, but everybody answered it anyway.
Sex
| Male | 18 | 78% |
| Female | 5 | 22% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Gender
| Male (cisgender) | 18 | 78% |
| Female (cisgender) | 5 | 22% |
| Male (transgender f->m) | 0 | 0% |
| Female (transgender m->f) | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Sexual Orientation
| Heterosexual | 16 | 70% |
| Homosexual | 0 | 0% |
| Bisexual | 2 | 9% |
| Asexual | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
Relationship Style
| Prefer monogamous | 5 | 22% |
| Prefer polyamorous | 8 | 35% |
| Uncertain / no preference | 10 | 43% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
[[ All but two of our polyamorous folks were from Europe, and one of those two was me. Clearly I need to move to Europe. ]]
Number of Current Partners
| 0 | 13 | 62% |
| 1 | 3 | 14% |
| 2 | 5 | 24% |
Relationship Goals
| ...and currently looking for more relationship partners | 13 | 59% |
| ...and currently not looking for more relationship partners | 6 | 27% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
[[ Bonus points to whoever answered “that’s complicated.” Also, if I’d been thinking I would have included an option for “not looking, but open to the possibility.” ]]
Relationship Status
| Single | 14 | 61% |
| Relationship | 6 | 26% |
| Married | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Children
| 0 | 20 | 87% |
| 1 | 1 | 4% |
| 2 | 2 | 9% |
More Children
| Yes | 6 | 27% |
| No | 8 | 36% |
| Uncertain | 8 | 36% |
Work and Education
Work Status
| Student | 14 | 61% |
| Academics (on the teaching side) | 0 | 0% |
| Self-employed | 2 | 9% |
| Independently wealthy | 0 | 0% |
| Non-profit work | 0 | 0% |
| For-profit work | 5 | 22% |
| Government work | 0 | 0% |
| Homemaking | 1 | 4% |
| Unemployed | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
Profession
| Philosophy | 0 | 0% |
| Finance / Economics | 2 | 9% |
| Statistics | 0 | 0% |
| Computers (AI) | 0 | 0% |
| Computers (other academic, computer science) | 1 | 4% |
| Computers (practical: IT, programming, etc.) | 8 | 35% |
| Physics | 1 | 4% |
| Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Other "hard science" | 0 | 0% |
| Psychology | 0 | 0% |
| Other "social science" | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Business | 0 | 0% |
| Law | 0 | 0% |
| Art | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Degree
| None | 1 | 5% |
| High School | 10 | 45% |
| 2 year degree | 2 | 9% |
| Bachelor's | 2 | 9% |
| Master's | 6 | 27% |
| PH D. | 1 | 5% |
| MD/JD/other professional degree | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Less Wrong
I wanted to get an idea of how our splinter tribe relates to Less Wrong as a whole, so I included enough of a subset of that section from the main survey to do so.
Less Wrong Use
| Doesn't use LW | 1 | 5% |
| Lurker (no account) | 6 | 29% |
| Lurker (account) | 1 | 5% |
| Poster (comments only) | 5 | 24% |
| Poster (discussion) | 8 | 38% |
| Poster (Main) | 0 | 0% |
Time in Community (LW, years)
| Mean | 1.9 |
| Stddev | 1.06 |
| Min | 0.2 |
| 1st quartile | 1 |
| 2nd quartile | 2 |
| 3rd quartile | 2.75 |
| Max | 4 |
Karma Score
| Mean | 183.1 |
| Stddev | 265.5 |
| Min | 0 |
| 1st quartile | 0.5 |
| 2nd quartile | 60 |
| 3rd quartile | 251 |
| Max | 800 |
Meetups
| Yes, regularly. | 3 | 15% |
| Yes, once or a few times. | 6 | 30% |
| No. | 11 | 55% |
Community (LW)
| Yes, all the time. | 4 | 20% |
| Yes, sometimes. | 8 | 40% |
| No. | 8 | 40% |
Took the main LW survey?
| Yes | 12 | 60% |
| No | 8 | 40% |
Less Wrong Study Hall
The meat lies here.
Time in Community (LWSH)
| Less than a month. | 3 | 13% |
| 1 - 3 months | 4 | 17% |
| 4 - 6 months | 3 | 13% |
| 6 - 9 months | 4 | 17% |
| 9 - 12 months | 9 | 39% |
Frequency
| Every day | 8 | 35% |
| Several times a week | 9 | 39% |
| Once or twice a week | 1 | 4% |
| Less than once a week | 1 | 4% |
| It varies | 3 | 13% |
| I haven't been here long enough to form a pattern | 1 | 4% |
Time in the Hall (per visit, in minutes)
| Mean | 226.1 |
| Stddev | 137.1 |
| Min | 60 |
| 1st quartile | 120 |
| 2nd quartile | 180 |
| 3rd quartile | 300 |
| Max | 540 |
[[ NINE HOURS??! O_O I salute you. ]]
Usage
| Academic studies | 18 | 27% |
| Personal projects | 21 | 32% |
| Deliberate practice (e.g. learning guitar) | 4 | 6% |
| Work for an employer | 5 | 8% |
| Chores, paperwork, or other necessities | 17 | 26% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
[[ I was surprised so many people use it for chores and the like. I do, but I thought I was just about the only one. On the plus side, my home actually gets cleaned up regularly now… ]]
Usage 2 (most important)
| Academic studies | 12 | 55% |
| Personal projects | 5 | 23% |
| Deliberate practice (e.g. learning guitar) | 0 | 0% |
| Work for an employer | 3 | 14% |
| Chores, paperwork, or other necessities | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
[[ Unsurprisingly, academics is the big thing. ]]
Draw
| Social reinforcement for working. | 22 | 33% |
| Social punishment for not working. | 7 | 10% |
| Camera-induced self-consciousness when working. | 15 | 22% |
| Distraction reduction via group pomodoros. | 18 | 27% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
Draw 2 (most important)
| Social reinforcement for working. | 14 | 61% |
| Social punishment for not working. | 0 | 0% |
| Camera-induced self-consciousness when working. | 1 | 4% |
| Distraction reduction via group pomodoros. | 7 | 30% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
[[ The carrot is more appreciated than the stick. ]]
Camera
| Yes, always. | 11 | 48% |
| Yes, sometimes. | 10 | 43% |
| Rarely | 1 | 4% |
| Never | 1 | 4% |
[[ I should have asked about desktop sharing too. I have a suspicion that it works even better than cameras, but only one or two people do it. ]]
Camera Off (why?)
This was a freeform response about why users leave their cameras off. Most users do leave their cameras on so there wasn’t a lot to go on here. Included themes were privacy (for oneself or others nearby), temporary non-working states (as when someone is eating), technical difficulties, or just generally not feeling sociable.
Time Zone
| UTC+10:00 | 2 | 9% |
| UTC+02:00 | 1 | 4.5% |
| UTC+01:00 | 13 | 60% |
| UTC+00:00 | 1 | 4.5% |
| UTC-05:00 | 5 | 23% |
[[ Apparently all our American users are on the east coast? Perhaps the West Coast people that might be interested already have access to the main real-life Less Wrong community/CFAR people, and thus don’t need the Hall. But I thought we had at least one guy in the West. I am confused. ]]
Temporal Habits (Weekdays)
| Mornings (6am-12pm) | 6 | 15% |
| Afternoons (12pm-5pm) | 9 | 22% |
| Evenings (5pm-10pm) | 18 | 44% |
| Late night/very early morning (10pm-6am) | 6 | 15% |
| Too variable to say | 2 | 5% |
| I don't use the room during the week | 0 | 0% |
Temporal Habits (Weekends)
| Mornings (6am-12pm) | 4 | 10% |
| Afternoons (12pm-5pm) | 11 | 26% |
| Evenings (5pm-10pm) | 13 | 31% |
| Late night/very early morning (10pm-6am) | 6 | 14% |
| Too variable to say | 7 | 17% |
| I don't use the room on weekends | 1 | 2% |
[[ I meant to use time zone information and logon windows to figure out when the room is populated and not, but never got around to it. Maybe next year. Or someone else could do the honors. ]]
Referrals
| The initial announcement | 9 | 39% |
| Other comments or posts on Less Wrong | 7 | 30% |
| Referred by a friend or partner | 6 | 26% |
| Referred by a non-LW blog | 0 | 0% |
| Referred by a search engine | 0 | 0% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
Interaction (outside the Hall)
| Yes, regularly. | 9 | 39% |
| Yes, sometimes. | 7 | 30% |
| No. | 7 | 30% |
Interaction 2 (in person only)
| Yes, regularly. | 5 | 22% |
| Yes, sometimes. | 5 | 22% |
| I've met a few people in person once or twice. | 2 | 9% |
| No. | 11 | 48% |
[[ It looks like more people here get involved in-person than Less Wrong as a whole, but it looks like it might be because all our Germans know each other in real life. ]]
Romance
| Yes. | 5 | 22% |
| I didn't meet them through the Hall, but they come there now. | 2 | 9% |
| No. | 16 | 70% |
[[ That Yes% is much higher than Less Wrong proper, even though our gender balance isn’t much better. Shame our sample size is far too small to tell if it matters. I predict not. ]]
Base Akrasia (1–7 scale, 1 being no akrasia, 7 being functionally paralyzed)
| 1 | 1 | 5% |
| 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 | 4 | 18% |
| 4 | 5 | 23% |
| 5 | 6 | 27% |
| 6 | 5 | 23% |
| 7 | 1 | 5% |
Akratic Impact (Akrasia in the Hall, same scale as previous)
| 1 | 1 | 5% |
| 2 | 9 | 41% |
| 3 | 8 | 36% |
| 4 | 3 | 14% |
| 5 | 1 | 5% |
| 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 | 0 | 0% |
[[ Self-reporting being what it is, these numbers aren’t terribly reliable. But they’re all we’ve got for the moment and they do show an improvement. My thanks to whoever suggested that two absolute scales were a better idea than absolute + improvement. ]]
Hedonic Impact (Hedonic improvement in the Hall, 1–5, 1 being no/negative impact, 5 being large impact)
| 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 | 3 | 13% |
| 4 | 7 | 30% |
| 5 | 13 | 57% |
[[ If I’d been thinking I would have measured hedons in the same manner as akradons. Oh well, next year. ]]
Distractions (percentage)
| Mean | 29% |
| Stddev | 15 |
| Min | 10% |
| 1st quartile | 18.5% |
| 2nd quartile | 30% |
| 3rd quartile | 35% |
| Max | 70% |
[[ I am not sure if these numbers are low or high. I would have to compare them to distractibility outside the Hall, but that is much harder to notice and track unless you are explicitly looking for it. ]]
Distraction Cause
| People talking or otherwise drawing attention in the Hall during the pomo | 0 | 0% |
| Digital interruptions (email or IM) | 4 | 17% |
| In-person interruptions (family or friends wanting attention) | 7 | 30% |
| Spontaneous web browsing or other computer use. | 11 | 48% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
[[ I should have done the same checkbox/most-important thing here that I did with the Draw and Usage questions. Unsurprisingly, spontaneous web browsing topped the list by a large margin. ]]
Overwork (percentage)
| Mean | 34.7 |
| Stddev | 24.8 |
| Min | 0% |
| 1st quartile | 12.5% |
| 2nd quartile | 33% |
| 3rd quartile | 55% |
| Max | 90% |
Accomplishments
| Yes | 15 | 65% |
| No | 8 | 35% |
[[ Since we’re here for a reason, it seemed good to find out whether people are succeeding at their purpose. Hence this question and the next one. ]]
Accomplishment Examples
This was a freeform question and not everyone answered it. Most answers again involved academic work and study, including one brave soul who studied for and passed final exams for classes on which he’d skipped most of the lectures. I’m not certain if I should applaud that or not. Artistic endeavors were the second most common response, and showed up in the form of painting, manuscripts, fanfiction, and blog posts. One person has been using the Hall to translate HPMoR chapters, and another wrote an open source library. And one of our users landed a new job, for which they’d written their CV using the Hall. Congratulations!
Miscellaneous Feedback
Social Atmosphere
| 1 | 9 | 41% |
| 2 | 10 | 45% |
| 3 | 3 | 14% |
| 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 | 0 | 0% |
[[ Some people have suggested that the recent uptick in sociability and silliness during breaks would distract people. This is an attempt to measure it. More in the personal reflections section. ]]
Suggestion Box
This was a freeform question, and most respondents didn’t answer. The most common response by a fair margin was better enforcement of pomodoros, either technologically or socially. There were also multiple calls to replace tinychat.
Despite my complaining, I would be surprised if tinychat was replaced anytime soon. Better social enforcement of pomos should be possible, though. Remember that anyone can track the clock if they want.
Akrasia
Since we’re here to fight akrasia, measuring it seemed good. I copied almost the entire Akrasia section from Yvain’s survey. A couple of people noted some ambiguous questions. I wanted to keep the data comparable to LW proper, so rather than modifying his questions I added clarified ones in between.
Akrasia
| Yes | 11 | 50% |
| No | 11 | 50% |
Akrasia: Current
| Yes | 2 | 9% |
| No | 20 | 91% |
Akrasia: Illness
| Depression | 3 | 14% |
| Bipolar disorder | 2 | 10% |
| Schizophrenia | 0 | 0% |
| Obsessive-compulsive disorder | 0 | 0% |
| ADHD | 0 | 0% |
| PTSD | 0 | 0% |
| Autism or autism spectrum disorder | 2 | 10% |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 1 | 5% |
| Social phobia | 0 | 0% |
| Any personality disorder | 0 | 0% |
| None | 12 | 57% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
Akrasia: Medicines 1
| No | 14 | 67% |
| Other | 7 | 33% |
[[ Someone pointed out that the question as originally stated didn’t specify “medications taken specifically to combat akrasia,” so I repeated the question with that clarification for both this and the supplements question. ]]
Akrasia: Medicines 1.5
| No | 16 | 80% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
Akrasia: Medicines 2
| 1 | 2 | 25% |
| 2 | 2 | 25% |
| 3 | 3 | 38% |
| 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 | 1 | 13% |
Akrasia: Supplements 1
| No | 11 | 55% |
| Other | 9 | 45% |
Akrasia: Supplements 1.5
| No | 14 | 74% |
| Other | 5 | 26% |
Akrasia: Supplements 2
| 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 | 1 | 13% |
| 3 | 4 | 50% |
| 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 | 3 | 38% |
Akrasia: Therapy 1
| No | 10 | 63% |
| Other | 6 | 38% |
Akrasia: Therapy 2
| 1 | 1 | 9% |
| 2 | 3 | 27% |
| 3 | 1 | 9% |
| 4 | 1 | 9% |
| 5 | 5 | 45% |
Akrasia: Meditation 1
| No | 9 | 45% |
| Other | 11 | 55% |
Akrasia: Meditation 2
| 1 | 2 | 17% |
| 2 | 4 | 33% |
| 3 | 4 | 33% |
| 4 | 1 | 8% |
| 5 | 1 | 8% |
Akrasia: Elsewhat 1
| No | 9 | 50% |
| Other | 9 | 50% |
Akrasia: Elsewhat 2
| 1 | 3 | 27% |
| 2 | 3 | 27% |
| 3 | 3 | 27% |
| 4 | 1 | 9% |
| 5 | 1 | 9% |
Akrasia: Communication
| Yes | 16 | 76% |
| No | 5 | 24% |
Silliness
Some things suggested by our users when I was putting the survey together. This is just for fun.
Tinychat Hatred
| 1 | 4 | 18% (thousand burning suns) |
| 2 | 1 | 5% |
| 3 | 7 | 32% |
| 4 | 3 | 14% |
| 5 | 7 | 32% (Emperor Palpatine) |
Tinychat Screams (number of)
I don’t know how to correctly calculate averages or related statistics when some numbers are written in Knuth notation, so there’s not much to report here. My favorite answer was Pi^^^42.
Stuffies
| No | 5 | 24% |
| Yes, but only one | 2 | 10% |
| Yes, more than one | 13 | 62% |
| Tons | 1 | 5% |
Stuffies on Camera
| Yes | 10 | 48% |
| No | 11 | 52% |
[[ For some reason lots of us have stuffies. ]]
And that's the end of it. My thanks to Lachouette for feedback on a draft of this post, and to the Hall itself for keeping me on track while I was writing about it. Those who want to join us, consider yourselves invited.
-
I’m posting this to Main, but given that our splinter tribe is a very small fragment of Less Wrong, I’m not sure if it’s appropriate to Main. If a mod wants to move it, I won’t object. ↩
-
Someday we’ll have users with bizarre half- or quarter-hour timezone offsets and this will all fall down. ↩
-
While there’s no explicit rules about discussion topics, it’s probably a good idea to observe Less Wrong’s anti-politics norm. The few times I’ve witnessed conflicts between regulars, it was when politics came up in some way. ↩
30 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by bramflakes · 2014-03-10T13:16:49.317Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
It'd be cool if there were a link to the study hall in the sidebar.
Replies from: Error, adamzerner↑ comment by Adam Zerner (adamzerner) · 2015-01-23T19:10:21.215Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Very much agreed. It makes sense to me because a) the costs and risks of doing so are extremely low, and b) it has the potential to notably improve a couple hundred/thousand people's lives.
I find it to be concerning that rational people can't/don't coordinate to do stuff like this. Of course, the reason may be because there's something I'm overlooking, but I think this is unlikely because a) I personally feel pretty confident and b) the parent comment has 17 upvotes and 0 downvotes, so it seems that others agree.
Replies from: Lachouette↑ comment by Lachouette · 2015-04-05T10:21:46.301Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
How would one implement such a thing? Who should I ask to make it happen? I presume someone responsible for the site content, but I don't know who to ask.
... to take this onto a more action-oriented level.
Replies from: adamzerner↑ comment by Adam Zerner (adamzerner) · 2015-04-05T14:23:08.004Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I don't know who to ask, but I'll help you in any way I can.
Clicking "Report Issues" of the footer on the bottom of the site took me to the LW GitHub repo. After clicking around, this page says that you could make feature requests here. And here are the most recent feature requests.
I get the feeling that this isn't maintained too much though. Ie. I worry that in posting a feature there, it could easily get forgotten about and/or ignored. Just a vague suspicion though.
My proposal:
- Start off by posting the feature request there. Perhaps it is maintained and someone will see it and add it.
- You do it. You seem to have a much better reputation than I do and I sense that this will improve the chances of success.
- If this doesn't get a response, I think a good next step would be to post in Discusssion a) a poll on who thinks it should/shouldn't be on the side bar and b) a request to be put in contact with someone who'll respond.
IMO, there are other things that should be on the sidebar too. Like:
- The map of LW users.
- A link to Open Thread.
- Perhaps a way to collaborate on projects.
- Perhaps a way to find people to live with.
Perhaps a better approach would be to make a post in Discussion on "what links do you think should be in the sidebar?". Do the feature requesting of things to add to the sidebar all at once. This actually seems like a better approach to me. a) If a lot of people upvote things, the request will carry more weight. b) I sense that a feature request for multiple things to add to the side bar will get more attention because it's more substantial. c) This seems like a way to get more done faster.
What do you think?
comment by Lachouette · 2014-03-10T13:39:27.884Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Thank you for writing this excellent post, error. I know a lot of time went into this in the last months. The Study Hall does need to be more visible and posts like this, especially on main, help in showing more people that this exists.
Replies from: jkadlubo↑ comment by jkadlubo · 2014-03-10T14:18:28.874Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
And maybe, just maybe, this visibility and ensuing popularity will push forward the idea of changing tinychat to something else.
Replies from: Lachouette, Lachouette↑ comment by Lachouette · 2015-04-05T10:29:42.009Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
(replying here for visibility)
By the way, Malcolm has fulfilled some of the Study Hall users' wishes by embedding the tinychat hall in his Complice website: http://lesswrong.com/lw/lqz/announcing_the_complice_less_wrong_study_hall/
Unfortunately it's still tinychat and therefore just as buggy, but it now has a timer! And you can see tasks of other users! That means that breaks are cut off somewhat more abruptly, but they no longer run over. Overall the hall got more awesome! Password stays "lw", you don't need to be a Complice user to access the site.
The new room can be found here.
Replies from: Lachouette↑ comment by Lachouette · 2015-12-05T22:07:25.043Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Malcolm has since created a new chatroom, which runs independently of tinychat! It's still the same link as mentioned in my earlier comment. In addition, a chatroom for effective altruists (the EA Workspace) now exists as well.
The transition has been mostly smooth and everyone's used to the new format by now, I think.
↑ comment by Lachouette · 2014-03-10T16:33:33.479Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
In fact, there is another try going on right now - the post was written before it happened. :) Anyone who wants to take part can contact me, redacted, tkadlubo or error.
I am hopeful that this time we will be able set up something awesome. ^_^
comment by jdgalt · 2014-03-18T02:34:28.000Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I wish there were an LW-related forum/location where politics are allowed (but easy for those not so inclined to ignore). I would use it, not so much for election-type stuff but for tossing out beliefs/theories on controversies (including some things relevant to a lot of the community, such as the Singularity) and seeing what bounces back.
I wouldn't want to do it if I thought it would generate ill will, but there are certainly lots of folk here whose perspectives would be useful, and who, even if they disagree, would not immediately reach for the slogans of demonization that I hear so much in the outside world.
Apologies if even this post turns out to be so contentious that I shouldn't have said it here.
Replies from: ChristianKl, Protagoras, Lumifer↑ comment by ChristianKl · 2014-03-18T16:02:46.228Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Politics is not forbidden on LW. That's not what the post politics is a mindkiller is about. If you think it's needed you could revive the LW politics thread that we had in the past.
↑ comment by Protagoras · 2014-03-18T13:59:55.938Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Slate Star Codex, Scott Alexander's blog, is a little like this; he tolerates and engages in a lot more political discussion than Less Wrong, but he is a Less Wronger, as are some of those who comment there. The overlap with the Less Wrong community is far from total, and obviously as Scott's personal blog it emphasizes his views, and it also doesn't only only talk about politics (it just doesn't avoid politics the way Less Wrong does), so it's probably not exactly what you're looking for, but it might be close enough for you to find it interesting, if you didn't already know about it. And I guess if there are any other blogs like Scott's with a similarly high level of political discussion, I'm interested in hearing about them myself.
↑ comment by Lumifer · 2014-03-18T16:44:59.253Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Politics are "allowed" as is most everything here (my definition of "not allowed" implies that moderators disappear posts and comments which are not allowed). There are certainly people who disapprove of politics on LW, but for any X it's pretty easy to find people who disapprove of X.
The only thing you risk here by bringing up political topics is your own karma as you should expect to be downvoted.
The governing rule is not "don't mention politics" but "don't be stupid".
comment by Entraya · 2014-04-07T14:12:06.397Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I just jumped straight into the chat without reading this post, because hell, the link was there and I might as well take a looksie. Turns out it was study time, and I quickly found myself grabbing that book i had to read for school out of 'oh shit sorry to interrupt', and read the remainder of that school day. This will be my new routine.
And now I'm looking at my case of delicious candy, considering whether I should only be allowed to eat one for every session I work outside of school time..
comment by hamnox · 2014-03-10T12:51:08.268Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Thank you for taking the time to gather all this information and post it. I'm very glad to hear that LW Study Hall still going, and going pretty well!
It'll be a good thing if Study Hall reenters the public consciousness. This post reinstalled my confidence in being an occasional user, and reminded me that I now have designated study time I can use pomodoros on!
Replies from: Lachouette↑ comment by Lachouette · 2014-03-10T13:22:42.435Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I would be happy to see you back in the Hall, hamnox! :)
comment by Emily · 2014-03-11T09:36:54.134Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
What's a stuffie?? My best guess is a stuffed toy animal.
Replies from: jkadlubo↑ comment by jkadlubo · 2014-03-11T13:53:30.853Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
That is a good guess. Some of LWSH silliness includes plush toys and stuffed animals.
Replies from: Michelle_Z↑ comment by Michelle_Z · 2014-03-20T21:33:01.640Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Yes. A number of people can recall a giant 6ft stuffed animal crocodile attacking Lachouette's head. There are plushies everywhere!
comment by MondSemmel · 2014-03-15T17:54:13.471Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Thanks for putting this together!
When I read the survey results, I noticed some weirdness in the percentages to the questions "Usage", "Draw", "Temporal Habits (Weekdays)" and "Temporal Habits (Weekends)": The answers sum to 100%, but the response counts don't sum to 23. These questions seem to have offered respondents to pick multiple answers, so imo the percentage values shouldn't be 'X% of responses are option Z' but instead 'X% of the 23 respondents picked this option'.
e.g. Usage updated with this change:
Academic studies 18 78%
Personal projects 21 91%
Deliberate practice (e.g. learning guitar) 4 17%
Work for an employer 5 22%
Chores, paperwork, or other necessities 17 74%
Other 1 4%
Replies from: Error↑ comment by Error · 2015-03-15T19:23:01.193Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I'm putting together the 2015 one now (yeah, it's late), and noticed this while looking back here for suggestions/fixes. I agree with you but I'm not sure how painful it will be to get it right. Last year I just took the stats that Google gave me on the responses.
comment by hibiscus · 2014-03-25T16:46:50.276Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
This is a fantastic idea, and thanks for posted this as I'm sure I'm not the only one who missed the initial announcement. I wish I could come up with some way to use it consistently at work (Not sure whether employer would care about having tinychat open; definitely can't video at work. Other people using this at work, what's your employment situation?). At the very least, I'll keep it in mind for working from home/personal projects at home.
Replies from: Lachouette↑ comment by Lachouette · 2014-04-02T19:30:15.619Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Tkadlubo has used this at work consistently (and with video) in the past year. Marcel can't broadcast a video from his office, but he shares his screen instead, which is perhaps even better for productivity. Both are comporate employees. It probably depends on your employer if you can have it running, but it seems worth a shot to ask (or to just try and see if someone complains).
Replies from: jkadlubo, hibiscus↑ comment by jkadlubo · 2014-09-07T19:16:34.250Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
tkadlubo's employer doesn't know about LWSH and tkadlubo's opinion is that this is none of their business as long as it does not interfere with his work.
As far as I remember, at some point the previous employer found out but didn't complain.
(oh, and I quote his opinions because I'm his wife. Maybe not as reliable source as the man himself, but close.)
comment by Daniel_Molloy · 2014-04-21T21:42:02.624Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I've noticed that the study hall currently has a security problem - It is possible to view the link to the intro document (which contains the password) before entering the password for the room. We just had a confused tinychat user wander in, and I would guess that's how.
I suggest removing the password from the intro document and putting it in one of the lesswrong posts instead. Dealing with random tinychat users is distracting.
Replies from: jkadlubo↑ comment by jkadlubo · 2014-09-07T19:12:13.562Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I wouldn't call that a problem. This way if you just stumble there you have the most important information. And also the link to the second room in case the first one is broken.
Random tinychat users are so rare that I think this way has more utility.