Predicting Virus Relative Abundance in Wastewater
post by jefftk (jkaufman) · 2023-08-10T15:46:55.554Z · LW · GW · 2 commentsThis is a link post for https://naobservatory.org/reports/predicting-virus-relative-abundance-in-wastewater/
2 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by Metacelsus · 2023-08-12T21:02:21.563Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
>If you're paying $8k per billion reads
>This will likely go down: Illumina has recently released the more cost effective NovaSeq X, and as Illumina's patents expire there are various cheaper competitors.
Indeed it did go down. Recently I paid $13,000 for 10 billion reads (NovaSeq X, Broad Institute; this was for my meiosis project). So sequencing costs can be much lower than $8K/billion.
Illumina is planning to start offering a 25 billion read flowcell for the NovaSeq X in October; I don't know how much this will cost but I'd guess around $20,000.
ALSO: if you're trying to detect truly novel viruses, using a Kraken database made from existing viral sequences is not going to work! However, many important threats are variants of existing viruses, so those could be detected (although possibly with lower efficiency).
Replies from: jkaufman