Feedback from Less Wrong Community

post by scott_from_castify · 2013-11-18T06:06:34.701Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 6 comments

Contents

6 comments

Hi from Castify.

We're continuing our work to turn the Less Wrong sequences into audio. Could you spare about 30 seconds to help us decide which one to do next? 

6 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by scott_from_castify · 2013-11-25T01:36:59.705Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Thanks everyone. How to Actually Change Your Mind up next.

comment by pinyaka · 2013-11-18T20:26:15.097Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Instead of Yes/No on the "will you buy it" question, you might add options like "maybe >50%" and "maybe <50%." There's a definite chance that I will buy the one that I'm voting for, but it's less than 50% so I'm just going to answer "no."

Replies from: scott_from_castify
↑ comment by scott_from_castify · 2013-11-19T01:29:27.097Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I suppose what we'd really like to know is the expected value of of each sequence so we can do the one with the highest expected revenue. We could have asked you to put probabilities of purchasing each sequence next to the name of the sequence. Maybe next time…

comment by somervta · 2013-11-20T05:35:53.490Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I'm so tempted to say quantum just to see how you do it!

But no. Responded, seriously.

Replies from: scott_from_castify
↑ comment by scott_from_castify · 2013-11-20T07:52:33.486Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

What we'd probably do is, for most articles, just tell you it's best to read the article here. We've done that quite a few times before and try to let people know we do this when describing the product.

comment by falenas108 · 2013-11-18T22:42:45.595Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I don't think you can physically do the quantum sequence, because so much of it is diagrams.