Posts

Decision-theoretic problems and Theories; An (Incomplete) comparative list 2018-07-11T02:59:34.883Z · score: 36 (9 votes)
Discussion of LW going on in felicifia 2013-01-15T05:59:03.984Z · score: 7 (8 votes)

Comments

Comment by somervta on Intrinsic motivation is crucial for overcoming akrasia · 2015-06-18T15:28:20.979Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Formatting note: something seems to have deleted a couple of your time units:

I spent ~1500 working on genuinely original scientific research.

and

which subsumes the 100 old Poincare conjecture,

Comment by somervta on FAI Research Constraints and AGI Side Effects · 2015-06-06T22:28:19.963Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Why do we need the full tower? Why couldn't it be the case that just one (or some other finite number) of the Turing Oracle levels are physically possible?

Comment by somervta on FAI Research Constraints and AGI Side Effects · 2015-06-05T00:41:51.179Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

We don't know that it's physically impossible, although it does look that way, but even if we did that doesn't mean it's contradictory, not to the extent that using it you'll "mostly derive paradox theorems and contradictions".

Comment by somervta on FAI Research Constraints and AGI Side Effects · 2015-06-05T00:01:22.745Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Why do you think that a hypercomputer is inherently contradictory?

Comment by somervta on Online Social Groups? · 2015-05-06T23:39:48.038Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

The LW Tumblr contingent has a Skype group.

Comment by somervta on If You Like This Orange... · 2015-04-02T13:57:44.939Z · score: 5 (5 votes) · LW · GW

The relevant test is 'Do I want to see more things like this on LW', and the answer is no, because I value clarity more than seeing things I would agree with did I understand them.

Comment by somervta on Error margins · 2015-03-21T11:24:39.380Z · score: 7 (7 votes) · LW · GW

Relevant previous LW posts on the A_p distribution and model stability

http://lesswrong.com/lw/igv/probability_knowledge_and_metaprobability/

http://lesswrong.com/lw/h78/estimate_stability/

http://lesswrong.com/lw/hnf/model_stability_in_intervention_assessment/

Comment by somervta on Open thread, Mar. 16 - Mar. 22, 2015 · 2015-03-20T10:45:06.635Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Interestingly, both concepts seem worthwhile to me... and I mostly advocate a combination of hedonistic and preference utilitarianism.

Comment by somervta on [FINAL CHAPTER] Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, March 2015, chapter 122 · 2015-03-15T00:17:16.666Z · score: 6 (6 votes) · LW · GW

Eliezer said this would just have been Harry antimatter-suiciding and Hermione waking up in a flaming crater.

Comment by somervta on Announcement: The Sequences eBook will be released in mid-March · 2015-03-03T04:28:40.009Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

Is the novel content written by you, Eliezer, or others?

Comment by somervta on GCRI: Updated Strategy and AMA on EA Forum next Tuesday · 2015-03-02T22:32:40.746Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Cool, that clears it up, thanks!

(I got that you were being sarcastic, but I wasn't clear which possible sucky thing you were disapproving of)

Comment by somervta on Innate Mathematical Ability · 2015-02-28T06:33:45.656Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I got the four, but not the rectangle - I just noticed that two elements only appeared three times.

Comment by somervta on Innate Mathematical Ability · 2015-02-28T05:47:56.943Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Huh. I got the same answer, but a different way.

Rnpu vgrz vf znqr hc bs gur cerfrapr be nofrapr bs bar bs fvk onfvp ryrzragf. Rnpu ryrzrag nccrnef sbhe gvzrf, rkprcg gubfr gjb.

Comment by somervta on GCRI: Updated Strategy and AMA on EA Forum next Tuesday · 2015-02-24T00:14:49.948Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

This comment confuses me.

Comment by somervta on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 109 · 2015-02-23T23:30:29.661Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

sure?

how sure are you, and how much do you have to bet?

Comment by somervta on An alarming fact about the anti-aging community · 2015-02-19T01:46:40.436Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

There's a Welcome Thread that you might want to check out!

Comment by somervta on AI-created pseudo-deontology · 2015-02-15T04:02:10.459Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

it is if you can get evidence about your UF.

Comment by somervta on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, January 2015, chapter 103 · 2015-01-30T23:48:48.181Z · score: 2 (4 votes) · LW · GW

I think you overestimate the likelihood that EY even read your comment. I doubt he reads all comments on hpmor discussion anymore.

Comment by somervta on Breaking the vicious cycle · 2015-01-19T10:43:12.447Z · score: 2 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Why was this trolling? This was in fact true, although Wei Dai's UDT ended up giving rise to a better framework for future and more general DT work.

Comment by somervta on Questions of Reasoning under Logical Uncertainty · 2015-01-09T19:00:20.783Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

The link to Non-Omniscience, Probabilistic Inference, and Metamathematics isn't right. Also, 'published earlier this year' is now wrong, it should be 'midway through last year' :D

Comment by somervta on SciAm article about rationality corresponding only weakly with IQ · 2014-12-29T00:34:28.666Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

The author also needs to work on his own rationality. The car example is just bad start to finish. You need a lot more information to even estimate net deaths from the car in question.

Which has nothing to do with the point being made.

Comment by somervta on Kickstarting the audio version of the upcoming book "The Sequences" · 2014-12-11T01:02:53.589Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

IIRC, we were doing it as an initial pass-through, but that plan might have changed.

Comment by somervta on I'm in a really dark place right now, I think I need help. · 2014-12-03T17:59:18.668Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Perhaps not, but there is good evidence for drugs+therapy doing better than either alone.

Comment by somervta on What are you learning? · 2014-09-18T05:29:24.704Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

I'm trying to learn Linear Algebra and some automata/computability stuff for courses, and I have basic set theory and logic on the backburner.

Comment by somervta on Deception detection machines · 2014-09-07T02:51:33.679Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

An actual device?!?

Comment by somervta on Rationality Quotes August 2014 · 2014-08-17T22:40:07.963Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Thanks! I didn't fine it with my minute of googling, good to know it's legit.

Comment by somervta on Rationality Quotes August 2014 · 2014-08-17T10:25:28.013Z · score: 11 (11 votes) · LW · GW

I don't suppose you have a source for the quote? (at this point, my default is to disbelieve any attribution of a quote unknown to me to Einstein)

Comment by somervta on Inquiry into community standards · 2014-08-07T02:44:54.964Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

'noble phantasm' is probably a reference to Fate/Stay Night, wherein a noble phantasm is a weapon or object of unusual reknown which a certain class of beings have that grants them signature powers.

Comment by somervta on Open thread, July 21-27, 2014 · 2014-07-28T10:18:22.142Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I would put such things in the bragging thread - why the separation?

Comment by somervta on Consider giving an explanation for your deletion this time around. "Harry Yudkowsky and the Methods of Postrationality: Chapter One: Em Dashes Colons and Ellipses, Littérateurs Go Wild" · 2014-07-11T02:35:08.656Z · score: 0 (4 votes) · LW · GW

I don't think it's a good idea to write things expressing opinions like this as if you're presenting the majority view, even when you think it is. I for one completely disagree with the first paragraph, and would only like transparency wrt deletions if it was unobtrusive.

Comment by somervta on Consider giving an explanation for your deletion this time around. "Harry Yudkowsky and the Methods of Postrationality: Chapter One: Em Dashes Colons and Ellipses, Littérateurs Go Wild" · 2014-07-11T02:28:49.018Z · score: 18 (22 votes) · LW · GW

So, after reading the comments, I figure I should speak up because selection effects

I appreciated the deleting of the original post. I thought it was silly, and pointless and not what should be on LW. I didn't realize it was being upvoted (or I would have downvoted it), and I still don't know why it was.

I endorse the unintrusive (i.e, silent and unannounces) deleting of things like this (particularly given that the author was explicitly not taking the posting seriously - written while drunk, etc), and I suspect others do as well.

There's a thing that happens wherein any disagreement with moderation ends up being much more noticable than agreement. I wouldn't be surprised if there were many who, like me, agreed with decisions like this and weren't speaking up. If so, I urge you to briefly comment (even just "I agree/d with the decision to delete").

Comment by somervta on Harry Yudkowsky and the Methods of Postrationality: Chapter One: Em Dashes Colons and Ellipses, Littérateurs Go Wild · 2014-07-11T02:11:41.070Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

This comments' parenthetical was at least 10x more valuable to me as the OP

Comment by somervta on [moderator action] Eugine_Nier is now banned for mass downvote harassment · 2014-07-03T23:31:47.855Z · score: 8 (10 votes) · LW · GW

I was scrolling through, saw this comment and reread ialdabaoth's comment and upvoted, which I wouldn't have without yours. upvoted.

Comment by somervta on Happiness and Children · 2014-06-27T10:51:53.803Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

You mean on average? The studies I'm thinking of had small or no differences, but I'm pretty sure there are other results out there.

Comment by somervta on Happiness and Children · 2014-06-27T06:53:58.108Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

I don't have the citation to hand, but IIRC there's research suggesting higher variance among parents is the most significant effect.

Comment by somervta on [LINK] seL4, secure operating system kernel is being open-sourced · 2014-06-25T05:06:19.979Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

You offering?

Comment by somervta on Relative and Absolute Benefit · 2014-06-19T19:44:36.474Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Ooops, I actually didn't mean to post that! Usually when I'm making an obvious criticism, after I write it I go back and double-check that I haven't missed or misinterpreted something, and I noticed that and meant to delete the unposted comment. I guess I must have hit enter at some point.

Comment by somervta on Relative and Absolute Benefit · 2014-06-19T03:27:25.657Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Because each additional dollar is less valuable, however, we would expect this transfer to make the group as a whole worse off.

grumble grumble only if the people the money went from were drawn from the same or similar distribution as the person it goes to.

Comment by somervta on The Power of Noise · 2014-06-18T14:34:48.087Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Luke's solution

Comment by somervta on [meta] Policy for dealing with users suspected/guilty of mass-downvote harassment? · 2014-06-06T13:00:48.786Z · score: 0 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I don't see a public spectacle - the names were redacted, etc. And Kaj's post seems to be asking "what should our policy on this be" to me.

Comment by somervta on Welcome to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013) · 2014-06-05T08:12:36.629Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I suggest you ask at the Effective Altruist facebook page - there's usually fairly good coverage there and if such a thing exists someone there will know of it.

Comment by somervta on Can noise have power? · 2014-05-23T12:28:47.512Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I don't see why Yudkowsky makes superintelligence a requirement for this.

Because often when we talk about 'worst-case' inputs, it would require something of this order to deliberately give you the worst-case, in theoretical CS, at least. I don't think Eliezer would object at all to this kind of reasoning where there actually was a plausible possibility of an adversary involved. In fact, one focus of things like cryptography (or systems security?) (where this is assumed) is to structure things so the adversary has to solve as hard a problem as you can make it. Assuming worst-case input is like assuming that the hacker has to do no work to solve any of these problems, and automatically knows the inputs that will screw with your solution most.

Comment by somervta on Moving on from Cognito Mentoring · 2014-05-17T03:05:55.392Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Not sure how much relevant overlap there is. CM seems focused primarily on education, and on spreading relatively available but difficult to compile info to people who can derive value from it.

CFAR is largely focused on much less available content, and on the developing of new content, bith focused at more general needs.

Not so sure about 80K, although it is much less education focused. It also seems to have an additional purpose - providing support for people to do good, as well as do be more competent.

Neither appear to have a funding gap

Comment by somervta on The Extended Living-Forever Strategy-Space · 2014-05-03T03:39:51.914Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I've seen discussion of Diarist (and maybe MRI) on LW before. None of the others seem to me to be plausible enough to even bother considering, and even those seem primarily only useful as a supplement to for the people reconstructing you from cryonics.

Comment by somervta on Beyond Bayesians and Frequentists · 2014-04-23T01:41:43.355Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Did this get written?

Comment by somervta on Normal Ending: Last Tears (6/8) · 2014-04-22T05:39:44.309Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

that's worse than letting billions of children be tortured to death every year. that's worse than dying from a supernova.

No? The story explicitly rejects this. It is only because the Superhappies can deal with the Babyeaters on their own, and that solutions to the human problem do not prevent this that the story is resolved other ways.

that's worse than dying from mass suicide.

I don't see the story as advocating this - Akon does not suicide, for example. It is not that the value difference between human life before and after the change is so large (large than the negative value of death) that is the problem. It is that difference in value, multiplied by the entire human race and it's future potential/member is so large as to outweigh a comparatively tiny number of deaths. I'm not sure that is true, but it is the position of those in the story.

you really think existence without pain is that bad? you really they are not "true humans".

I don't think he thinks that. I think he (Eliezer_2009) thinks they have lost something important, some aspect of their humanity - but that doesn't mean they are completely inhuman.

Comment by somervta on Meetup : Christchurch, NZ Inaugural Meetup · 2014-04-22T05:10:16.678Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Do you have planned articles for discussing? How late do you plan on going?

Comment by somervta on Hawking/Russell/Tegmark/Wilczek on dangers of Superintelligent Machines [link] · 2014-04-22T04:40:14.754Z · score: 5 (5 votes) · LW · GW

This has been circulating among the tumblrers for a little bit, and I wrote a quick infodump on where it comes from.

TL;DR: The article comes from (is co-authored by) a brand-new x-risk organization founded by Max Tegmark and four others, with all of the authors from it's scientific advisory board.

Comment by somervta on Meetup : Christchurch, NZ Inaugural Meetup · 2014-04-14T12:13:42.522Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

The guys in the Australian community are truly awesome! I'd definitely recommend it if it's a viable option for you (and I'm happy to talk about the people I met at the meetup next Sunday if anyone wants)

Comment by somervta on Open Thread April 8 - April 14 2014 · 2014-04-13T05:31:46.127Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I think the main effect wrt the former is as a introduction to rationality and the Sequences