Beta-Beta – Recent Discussion

post by Radmin · 2018-03-04T05:34:23.341Z · LW · GW · 6 comments

Contents

6 comments

Over on our beta-beta (I guess the technical term is "alpha") site, we're experimenting with a new system for Recent Comment, renaming it to "Recent Discussion" and tweaking some features.

The recent comments are organized by post, sorted in the order of "post most recently commented on", showing the three most recent comments for each post.

If you haven't read a post, it also shows a short blurb of the first 300 characters of the post (similar to how the recent comments themselves do).

A couple motivations for this:

This is a fairly major change, so we wanted to collect some feedback before moving forward on it, and it seemed easier to get that feedback if we temporarily connected the live database to the Lessestwrong.com. For the next few days you can log in there normally.

Longterm, there's a few other features that could get rolled into this, such as:

https://www.lessestwrong.com/

6 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Raemon · 2018-03-04T05:36:30.237Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Accidentally posted this under my admin account, alas. :P

I have some thoughts-so-far about my own experience using the Discussion system, but will hold off for now.

comment by ChristianKl · 2018-03-04T06:10:44.456Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

When it comes to the recent comments I would find it good if replies to collapsed posts wouldn't show up on the list.

Replies from: Raemon
comment by Raemon · 2018-03-04T06:17:33.359Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Which do you mean by collapsed posts in this case?

Replies from: ChristianKl, Raemon
comment by ChristianKl · 2018-03-05T05:48:40.987Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I think I meant what's now under "Posts with negative karma will not have their comments show up in the recent discussion, preventing runaway demon threads from taking over the front page." If that was already there yesterday I'm sorry that I missed it.

Replies from: Raemon
comment by Raemon · 2018-03-05T06:24:48.798Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Ah, cool. Yep that was actually the primary reason we did this now.

We'll probably also eventually address individual subthreads of comments that seem to be spiraling negatively, but it's a bit more work.

comment by Raemon · 2018-03-04T06:17:56.728Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

(did you mean collapsed comments?)