[Linkpost] Transcendence: Generative Models Can Outperform The Experts That Train Them

post by Bogdan Ionut Cirstea (bogdan-ionut-cirstea) · 2024-06-18T11:00:04.629Z · LW · GW · 3 comments

This is a link post for https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11741v1

Contents

3 comments

Authors: Edwin Zhang, Vincent Zhu, Naomi Saphra, Anat Kleiman, Benjamin L. Edelman, Milind Tambe, Sham M. Kakade, Eran Malach.

Abstract:

Generative models are trained with the simple objective of imitating the conditional probability distribution induced by the data they are trained on. Therefore, when trained on data generated by humans, we may not expect the artificial model to outperform the humans on their original objectives. In this work, we study the phenomenon of transcendence: when a generative model achieves capabilities that surpass the abilities of the experts generating its data. We demonstrate transcendence by training an autoregressive transformer to play chess from game transcripts, and show that the trained model can sometimes achieve better performance than all players in the dataset. We theoretically prove that transcendence is enabled by low-temperature sampling, and rigorously assess this experimentally. Finally, we discuss other sources of transcendence, laying the groundwork for future investigation of this phenomenon in a broader setting.

Summary thread: https://x.com/nsaphra/status/1803114822445465824. 

Some previous discussion in an alignment-relevant context: GPTs are Predictors, not Imitators [LW · GW].

3 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.