Kaj Sotala's Posts

post by lukeprog · 2012-09-10T21:58:05.689Z · score: 9 (11 votes) · LW · GW · Legacy · 10 comments

Here's an index of Kaj_Sotala's articles (not including meta posts):

Also see: Yvain's posts and lukeprog's posts.


Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by tgb · 2012-09-10T22:48:17.112Z · score: 11 (11 votes) · LW · GW

It would be nice if this were an automated feature of the website versus something lukeprog has to spend time on.

comment by lukeprog · 2012-09-10T23:07:16.496Z · score: 19 (19 votes) · LW · GW

"...versus something lukeprog's assistant has to spend time on."

comment by Rubix · 2012-09-11T00:11:57.274Z · score: 12 (16 votes) · LW · GW

Perhaps lukeprog's assistant should make a separate account to post these through, to avoid getting this complaint every time they make such a post.

comment by Kevin · 2012-09-11T08:24:47.567Z · score: 2 (6 votes) · LW · GW


comment by Dorikka · 2012-09-11T23:52:04.946Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

He could get paid in karma, too. ;P

comment by Wei_Dai · 2012-09-12T05:52:08.529Z · score: 11 (11 votes) · LW · GW

I updated my PHP script to be able to generate a post index, sortable by votes.

comment by gwern · 2012-09-11T01:05:37.583Z · score: 10 (12 votes) · LW · GW

Well, it pretty much is: http://lesswrong.com/user/Kaj_Sotala/submitted/

It's just that Kaj is bad about using summary breaks and so the page is a pain to navigate; contrast with my submissions.

comment by tgb · 2012-09-11T13:14:16.829Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · LW · GW

The lack of sorting by up-votes is unfortunate.

comment by Kaj_Sotala · 2012-09-11T05:14:12.115Z · score: 4 (4 votes) · LW · GW

Eeep! Thank you.

Reading them now, many of my earlier posts (including some relatively upvoted ones) feel embarassingly badly written. It's a wonder how much one can improve in just a couple of years.

comment by [deleted] · 2012-09-12T03:34:12.805Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Wow, the titles-only index is way more readable than the other broken ways to get this sort of thing.