A Game for Probabilistic Thinking
post by Erdrick
I friend of mine recently recommended a small independent game to me called Clairvoyance (www.gameofclairvoyance.com), that I thought might be of interest to the LW community. It's effectively a competitive turn-based strategy game, but it's distinguishing feature is that each player places 5 moves at a time, which are then interlaced and executed with the opponent's 5 moves. Thus requiring the clairvoyance of the game's name - you need to anticipate your opponent's moves in order plan your own, included anticipating their anticipations of your actions, etc.
It's clearly not intended as a rationality aid, and I originally did not approach it as such. But after getting trounced in my first few games, I found it very helpful to approach each turn probabilistically - thinking of each round in terms of a probability cloud of possible positions for various pieces, and planning around attacking swathes of that cloud rather than specific squares. Though early on, I can also foresee an element of theory-of-mind practice emerging if you play one opponent repeatedly and begin to learn their particular style.
If any one cares to give it a whirl, the game is just $5 while still in beta. It's cheap, it's fun and easy to learn, and games are relatively fast. If anyone wants to rumble, my handle in-game is also Erdrick - I have a feeling the crowd here would provided for some excellent opponents.
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by TrE ·
2012-12-30T08:31:10.293Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
The same applies to Diplomacy and many other games in which one can enhance their performance by thinking probabilistically.
Replies from: FiftyTwo
↑ comment by FiftyTwo ·
2012-12-30T20:43:34.755Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I've played diplomacy, what other examples were you thinking of?
Replies from: handoflixue, TrE, evand
↑ comment by handoflixue ·
2012-12-31T19:27:47.991Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Magic: the Gathering comes to mind, since the community often focuses explicitly on thinking-about-probabilities due to both the hidden information (what cards does your opponent have?) and the random factor (what cards will I draw later in the game?)
One of my favorite stories is about a high-level competitor who had a tendency to win since he could work out "I will ONLY win if I draw this one card" and would then craft his entire game around the expectation of that card - after all, if he failed to draw it, he was dead anyway :)
↑ comment by TrE ·
2012-12-30T23:07:25.733Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
When I wrote the comment, I explicitly thought of poker, chess, the Settlers of Catan and Wizard, all of these games where thinking with probabilities (w.r.t. the opponents' cards / the opponents' actions and the state of the board / the opponents' actions and the roll of the dice / the opponents' cards, respectively) can be more or less helpful. In the end, I chose diplomacy because additionally, it shares the characteristic of simultaneous moves.
↑ comment by evand ·
2012-12-30T22:24:19.816Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
There are a large number of games where the probabilistic nature is more readily apparent. Bridge is one of my favorites, but poker and backgammon both come to mind.