post by [deleted] · · ? · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Dagon · 2025-02-04T01:17:00.558Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

(I’m using time-sensitive words, even though we are stepping out of the spacetime of our universe for parts of this discussion.)

Maybe use different words, so as not to imply that there is a temporal, causal, or spacial relation.

Many people realize that, conceptually “below” or “before” any “base universe,” there is

I don't realize or accept that.  Anything that would be in those categories are inaccessible to our universe, and not knowable or reachable from within.  They are literally imaginary.

Replies from: LVSN
comment by LVSN · 2025-02-04T04:55:40.823Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

What are the other describable or possible-though-indescribable hypotheses? If it's intuitive that there are no other hypotheses to start from — if the explanations have been reduced to some small number of all imaginable possibilities — that's a non-nothing sort of evidence which ought to be contended with at the very least, rather than scoffed at with 'you didn't see an epistemic polylemma therefor there's no evidence that there was one'.