An Alternate History of the Future, 2025-2040

post by Mr Beastly (mr-beastly) · 2025-02-24T05:53:25.521Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

Contents

  Mid-2025:
  Late-2025:
  Mid-2026:
  Option 1)
  Option 2)
  2026: Option 1) Timeline
  2028:
  2030:
  2035:
  2040:
  2026: Option 2) Timeline
  2028:
  2030:
  2035:
  2040:
None
No comments

This post is a response to @L Rudolf L [LW · GW]'s excellent post here: 

 

Imho, the timeline in @L Rudolf L [LW · GW]'s post seems very reasonable, up until this line/point:

- "2026... it remains true that existing code can now be much more easily attacked since all you need is an o6 or Claude subscription." -- @L Rudolf L [LW · GW]

This part of this timeline also coincides with: 

- “Our internal benchmark is around 50th (best programmer in the world) and we’ll hit #1 by the end of the year [2026].” – Sam Altman

 

If these new "PhD+ level reasoning/coding agents" are able to hack nearly any existing (human written) software platform (as @L Rudolf L [LW · GW] describes), then two main viable options will follow.

  1. All software platforms, libraries and apps will have to be reviewed, patched and updated by the highest level "reasoning/coding agents" available ... or ...
  2. These "PhD+ level reasoning/coding agents" would not be allowed access to the Internet, where they could be instructed to try to exploit existing software/apps.

 (There might be other plausible options after this point in 2026. But, none immediately come to my mind.)

Both of these options seem plausible, so I'll lay them both out below, as "Option 1)" and "Option 2)", respectively.

 

Mid-2025:

Late-2025:

 

Mid-2026:

Option 1)

Option 2)

 

2026: Option 1) Timeline

2028:

2030:

2035:

2040:

 

2026: Option 2) Timeline

2028:

2030:

2035:

2040:

 

___
“It’s not going to be dramatic. It’s not going to be an epic battle with the robot army.  We just get more and more confused…” -- Connor Leahy

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.