post by [deleted] · · ? · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Yair Halberstadt (yair-halberstadt) · 2022-06-15T05:24:23.976Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

"Practical" utilisation of quantum computing

From what I understand, given current algorithms, practical quantum computing would break certain cryptographic protocols, and slightly speed up almost all other algorithms, but otherwise not have much of an impact.

Replies from: niplav, DragonGod
comment by niplav · 2022-06-15T15:36:24.837Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I think it would also make simulation of quantum physical phenomena much faster.

Replies from: yair-halberstadt
comment by DragonGod · 2022-06-15T06:17:50.052Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Hmm, I'll edit/reword that section.

I reworded it to express uncertainty.

comment by Raemon · 2022-06-15T08:03:36.946Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
  • This doesn't include ordinary persuasion however advanced.

Is there a reason you're making this exception?

Replies from: DragonGod
comment by DragonGod · 2022-06-15T08:32:29.686Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Persuasion carried out through ordinary means of communication is capability deployed via the human interface in my taxonomy of real-world capabilities [LW · GW].

Here, the idea is influencing humans (or other agents) via means other than communication.