Posts

Comments

Comment by chalybs_levitas on The Parable of the Dagger · 2011-11-19T13:13:26.394Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Oh, I assumed that they were walking in a circle and the third bull was counting both ahead of him and behind him, even though those bulls are both the same, on the assumption that 'single file' =/= 'straight line'.

Comment by chalybs_levitas on Sorting Pebbles Into Correct Heaps · 2011-11-19T11:51:47.893Z · score: 5 (6 votes) · LW · GW

The fish do not build heaps at all, and are therefore incapable of civilization or even meaningful disagreement on the correctness of heaps. So they should be excluded. (is what the PebbleSorter people might have thought)

Comment by chalybs_levitas on Memory, Spaced Repetition and Life · 2011-11-19T10:55:07.806Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I like that you specifically noted an exception in the case of foreign languages, as it was the one salient point I would have raised otherwise. Not that I think it might be the only point in contention to be raised, merely that it would be the only one I would have brought up, though. I wish you had emphasized it a little more heavily in your rhetoric, though that might just be my own biases in play.

Comment by chalybs_levitas on That Alien Message · 2011-11-19T09:08:54.734Z · score: 2 (1 votes) · LW · GW

What if GR is wrong, and it does not output GR because it spots the flaw that we do not?

Comment by chalybs_levitas on Lawful Uncertainty · 2011-11-19T07:55:39.428Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

"There are lawful forms of thought that still generate the best response, even when faced with an opponent who breaks those laws"

I've only just come to the Bayesian way of thought, so please direct me to the correct answer if I'm not thinking about this right:

If I and my opponent are of equal training, rationality, abilty, and intellect, except that my opponent has a 10% chance of doing something completely at odds with rationality as we both understand it due to some mental damage: how should I plan to face him?

If I have plan A to deal with his plan A, plan B to deal with his plan B, and so on (as close as I am capable of discerning them), is there a rational way to deal with this unpredictable element, and how do I determine how much of my resources to spend on this plan?

That is: how do I plan in the face of the unpredictable, especially in cases where I do not have the resources to cover every eventuality?

Comment by chalybs_levitas on Welcome to Less Wrong! (2010-2011) · 2011-11-19T06:44:58.142Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Hello, I am Alexander, and also a number of variations on Chalybs Levitas (depending on the screenname parameters of the site I'm signing up to).

I don't consider myself a rationalist, yet. I still have a lot to learn, but I've started working my way through the Sequences, and I've started my walk through the other articles, by opening a new tab at each new link.

I value language, and I am practicing my craft as a writer (I'm terrible) as well as studying Japanese (also terrible there).

I chose Japanese as the foreign language to study first in part because I want to move to Japan, and I've signed up to the site because one of the things I've learned through reading the articles and Mr. Yudowsky's fiction is that people are not pessimistic enough in preparing their plans. I tried to apply pessimism to my current plan to live in Japan, and I don't think I got it right. I'm hoping to learn more, and to work out answers I would not have found on my own, by talking with the community here.

Phew.

Nice meeting you all, ~Alexander