Posts
Comments
There exists something (objective value) universally compelling that any sufficiently advanced mind (/bayesian agent) would recognize as valuable - something possibly beyond our evolutionary happenstance and/or something timeles
Hey Robert,
I was thinking about this post again when reading [No Universally Compelling Arguments](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PtoQdG7E8MxYJrigu/no-universally-compelling-arguments) and was curious how you interperate this statement wrt to the post. Do you disagree with NUCA? do you have some other interpretation? Would be happy to hear what you think.
Eric
I have donated as well. I appreciate the work yall do.
I see and appreciate what you're doing here ;)
(and what we will will change what will happen) (possibly to a Will) (unless our will won't work)