Posts

Comments

Comment by stoat on Ideas for an action coordination website · 2019-03-10T18:17:54.442Z · score: 4 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I agree that the type of action needed to address the parenteral nutrition example would be very unlikely to arise from a hypothetical online crowd action platform.

I think much of the purpose here is to brainstorm what the most effective version of such a platform could look like, and thereby also get a picture about what class of problems such a platform might be able to address or help with.

Is your position that that class of problems is small, and/or those problems are better addressed by existing solutions anyway? Maybe that's right. We are largely brainstorming here to gauge whether a marginal improvement is possible (and probably hoping that a big improvement is).

Comment by stoat on If a "Kickstarter for Inadequate Equlibria" was built, do you have a concrete inadequate equilibrium to fix? · 2019-02-22T03:25:35.456Z · score: 4 (3 votes) · LW · GW

Actually Raemon asked specifically about such possible negative outcomes here. I only point it out because I think you make a valuable point and I'd be interested to see any further discussions of it.

Comment by stoat on Is there an assurance-contract website in work? · 2019-02-22T03:07:20.901Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Interesting, what's the connection here? Are you saying that assurance contracts could be implemented using a prediction market? Or were you thinking of something more along the lines of Augur's distributed voting system for decision outcomes? Anyway I'd be interested to hear what you're thinking here.

Comment by stoat on Is there an assurance-contract website in work? · 2019-02-22T02:53:40.417Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Please do!

Comment by stoat on Is there an assurance-contract website in work? · 2019-02-22T02:52:21.683Z · score: 13 (4 votes) · LW · GW

Is CollAction kind of what you had in mind? Wikipedia also mentions PledgeBank which closed down in 2015 but still has a site with all the archived pledges at www.pledgebank.com. Not sure but I don't think either of these sites allow versions of assurance contracts that use financial contributions.

I wonder what a good binding mechanism might be for crowdaction sites in general, because once the quorum is reached you still have to get everybody to go ahead and perform the action. Any thoughts?

A site based on dominant assurance contracts would also be interesting. It might be a bit more like Kickstarter, in that maybe the entrepreneur initiating the DAC can market and popularize the action, and be responsible for the action happening when/if the quorum is reached.

Comment by stoat on Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory · 2019-01-31T01:05:20.732Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Does UDASSA include concepts like the "observer graph" and "graph machine" that Muller describes in the paper? Is Muller just filling out details that are inevitable once you have the core UDASSA concept?

Comment by stoat on What's the most annoying part of your life/job? · 2016-10-24T19:20:36.734Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Yes, that's absolutely an aspect of it.

I'm pretty agnostic about what form a solution to the original needing-to-have-a-job-to-support-myself problem might take. The hourly breakdown thing was just an attempt to ballpark some money amounts, with an emphasis on how high the value might potentially be for me. I suppose other categories of solution along the lines of tiny houses or solar panels or whatever that might ease transition to lower cost of living lifestyles would have very different prices or payment structures probably ending up a lot lower than the scenario I first outlined.

Comment by stoat on What's the most annoying part of your life/job? · 2016-10-24T18:57:10.562Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I'm not actually in option A. in real life, sorry if I gave that impression. It's just an attempt to illustrate how much I might be willing to pay, if hypothetically restricted to those two options. Not suggesting restriction to those two options is realistic or anything, nor do I have any mechanism in mind that might lead to those options.

Comment by stoat on What's the most annoying part of your life/job? · 2016-10-24T12:22:28.025Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I do know.

Comment by stoat on What's the most annoying part of your life/job? · 2016-10-24T01:51:04.133Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Same problem for me. And I agree, seems like it would take a lot of ingenuity to turn a solution to this problem into a viable business. Maybe products aiding rat-race opt-out strategies, coordination tech enabling 20 hour work weeks.... I don't really have any specific ideas.

But to answer the second question, I feel like I would pay a great deal for something like this. Hard to quantify since solutions offered might be partial, and a total solution might eliminate income, etc.; but just to illustrate (and ignoring things like extreme saving for early retirement, etc.) between the options A. and B. ---

  • A. $80,000/year at 40 hours a week
  • B. third party company L somehow enables me to earn $40,000/year at 20 hours a week in the same job with the same employer as above, but company L takes a 25% cut of my pay (so $10,000 a year to company L)

--- I'd gratefully choose option B. (which is just to give a sense of my intuitive preference, not saying I'd defend the merits of that choice necessarily).

Comment by stoat on Open Thread, Aug. 15. - Aug 21. 2016 · 2016-08-19T03:19:48.789Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Interesting idea. So I guess that approach is focused on measure across universes with physics similar to ours? I wonder what fraction of simulations have physics similar to one level up. Presumably ancestor simulations would.

Comment by stoat on Open Thread, Aug. 15. - Aug 21. 2016 · 2016-08-18T14:55:52.862Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

It seems possible to me that after passing some threshold of metaphysics insight, beings in basement reality would come to believe that basement reality simulations have high measure.

Past a certain point, maybe original basement reality beings actually believe they are simulated. Then accurately simulated basement reality beings would mean simulating beings who think (correctly) that they are in a simulation.

I don't know how to balance such possibilities to figure out what's likely.

Comment by stoat on Open thread, Jul. 25 - Jul. 31, 2016 · 2016-07-28T18:55:41.713Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Eliezer ruminates on foundations and wrestles with the difficulties quite a bit in the Metaethics sequence, for example:

Comment by stoat on Open Thread Feb 16 - Feb 23, 2016 · 2016-02-15T14:42:15.416Z · score: 7 (7 votes) · LW · GW

Michael Vassar makes some observations about this in this chat from about 37:50-40:30. He begins describing something called a "hexayurt tridome", some kind of portable desert structure, and finishes saying "for the cost of engineering the 2016 Toyota Corolla and with the level of engineering skill required to engineer the 2016 Toyota Corolla it would probably be possible to engineer a house that would cost less than a Toyota Corolla and that could be deployed more easily and be adequate for any climate pretty much anywhere in the world where there's a reasonable amount of free space".

Comment by stoat on Open thread, Nov. 02 - Nov. 08, 2015 · 2015-11-02T17:48:41.816Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Thanks a bunch that is the one!

Comment by stoat on Open thread, Nov. 02 - Nov. 08, 2015 · 2015-11-02T15:10:04.428Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I have a foggy memory of someone here (I think it was gwern) linking to an article about simulation interface design. It built up examples based on a bird's eye view of a car steering down a road. I haven't been able to find it, anyone know a link to the article?

Comment by stoat on Book Review: Naive Set Theory (MIRI research guide) · 2015-08-15T15:39:10.039Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

Looks to me like Halmos does intend "one-to-one" to mean "injective". What he writes is "A function that always maps distinct elements onto distinct elements is called one-to-one (usually a one-to-one correspondence)." Then he mentions inclusion maps as examples of one-to-one functions.

Comment by stoat on Effectiveness of different supplement brands? · 2015-02-16T17:14:33.725Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

Biotest is very reputable (that's my impression anyway) for supplements geared towards weightlifters.

https://www.t-nation.com/store

They have stuff in their "Health" category with broader appeal (Superfood is pretty cool). I've been very pleased with what I've used from them.

Comment by stoat on Open thread, August 4 - 10, 2014 · 2014-08-04T14:41:24.535Z · score: 5 (5 votes) · LW · GW

Caffeine's a strong drug for me, except I have a huge tolerance now because I consume so much coffee. One night a few years ago, after I had quit caffeine for about a month, I was picking away at a bag of chocolate almonds while doing homework, and after a few hours I noticed that I felt pretty much euphoric. So yeah, this is good info to have if you're trying to get off caffeine.

Comment by stoat on Open Thread, December 2-8, 2013 · 2013-12-03T20:19:50.893Z · score: 6 (6 votes) · LW · GW

This sounds familiar to me. I'm 32 and I definitely remember hearing stuff like this. I remember in elementary school (so, late 80s early 90s) seeing the Canada food guide recommend a male adult eat something like up to 10 servings of grains a day, which could be bread or pasta or cereal. You were supposed to have some dairy products each day, maybe 2-4. And maybe 1-3 servings from Meat & Alternates.

I remember that pretty much all fat was viewed (popularly) with caution, at least until Udo Erasmus came out with his book Good Fat, Bad Fat.

But I do recall a clear message that soda and snacks were unhealthy. It wasn't as though soda was thought ok just because it was low fat / high carb.

Comment by stoat on Our Phyg Is Not Exclusive Enough · 2012-04-17T14:26:28.418Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Is the insight about free will and logical facts part of the sequences? or is it something you or others discuss in a post somewhere? I'd like to learn about it, but my searches failed.

Comment by stoat on Request for input: draft of my "coming out" statement on religious deconversion · 2012-03-04T16:30:43.376Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I have a low attention span but I read through your entire document and when I reached the end I was surprised because I had the impression I was still reading the preliminary part. So, for what it's worth, I found it easy to get through.

Comment by stoat on Weight training · 2011-08-26T19:25:46.700Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

I recommend articles by Chad Waterbury and Dan John to start, which you can find on www.t-nation.com (which is a quality resource in general). Dan John tends to recommend simple, effective strategies, and Waterbury writes a lot addressing your first and second questions.

A great place to start, this article by Mark Rippetoe: http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/most_lifters_are_still_beginners

Eric Cressey and Christian Thibaudeau write great stuff, if you're into a more complicated approach.

Also I agree strongly with Zed's point 2.

I agree with Zed's point 3. about supplements sort of. I think the exceptions are (1) "peri-workout nutrition" about which there are many complex strategies but you can keep it simple, say a whey protein & gatorade shake before or after (or both) your workouts, and (2) things often lacking in a modern diet or lifestyle: fish oil (or some other way to get omega 3) and vitamin D seem to be the most frequent recommendations.

Comment by stoat on Discuss: How to learn math? · 2010-10-11T01:45:38.188Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

Thanks for this. I guess this goes to show how hard it can be to communicate math well. When I learned the sin(x)/x limit I accepted the "proof" by geometric intuition with no protest and was not alert to any deeper source of confusion here.

Come to think of it, the rigorous treatments of sine that I've seen probably all use power series definitions. To see that it's the same function as the one defined using triangles I expect you have to appeal to derivative properties, so that approach would not skirt the issue.

Comment by stoat on Discuss: How to learn math? · 2010-10-10T19:42:57.461Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · LW · GW

I agree the problem is even more pronounced in physics.

Also, I am interested in and would appreciate the details of the case study to which you refer.

Comment by stoat on Discuss: How to learn math? · 2010-10-09T20:32:48.057Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · LW · GW

I also find that scary/frustrating. But don't you find you can relearn those forgotten chunks much more rapidly than the first time, if you need to?

Comment by stoat on Discuss: How to learn math? · 2010-10-09T20:24:54.163Z · score: 5 (5 votes) · LW · GW

My own experience is that it is fairly easy to identify points of confusion, and the hard part is finding a book or whatever, at the right level, to address that specific point. This is a tough problem to solve with self-teaching.

Comment by stoat on Waterloo, ON, Canada Meetup: 6pm Sun Oct 18 '09! · 2009-10-16T02:20:15.624Z · score: 0 (0 votes) · LW · GW

If this meetup happens, I'd drop in.

Comment by stoat on An observation on cryocrastination · 2009-07-23T15:49:38.150Z · score: 4 (4 votes) · LW · GW

I can tell you a reason I've cryocrastinated. I don't expect the reason to hold up under scrutiny. It held up under my half-hearted scrutiny, but so what? I have low confidence in my own ability to be rational. In fact, I'd be grateful if someone can eliminate this worry for me.

So, the reason is concern about dystopian or hellish scenarios. For a cartoon of such a scenario, think I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream.

One thought I had was that these scenarios are so unlikely that if I felt they warranted avoiding cryonics, I'd also feel they warranted preventative suicide. I'm confused about where I stand on this, but in any case preventative suicide is an action I am absolutely unable to take, whereas not signing up for cryonics is easy.

Thanks if you can straighten this out for me.