0 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by DavidLS · 2015-01-12T23:11:03.612Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Just wanted to jump in here and say that Nancy, Jeremy, and the whole team are both exceptionally rational, and exceptionally capable. In my ~10 years of programming professionally, Apptimize is easily the best working environment I've experienced.
Absolutely worth checking out.
comment by MalcolmOcean (malcolmocean) · 2015-01-12T22:30:17.838Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I like the bit about curiosity. Have you looked at all into other factors like grit? :P
Replies from: None, Darmani↑ comment by [deleted] · 2015-01-12T22:40:13.856Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
you'd be a good contributor to our debates on company values
Replies from: IlyaShpitser, adamzerner↑ comment by IlyaShpitser · 2015-01-13T22:30:41.663Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
What about absorbency and electrical conductivity?
Mandatory reading of any kind is super weird and off putting to me.
Good luck to you guys, I hope you make a ton of money!
↑ comment by Adam Zerner (adamzerner) · 2015-01-16T04:30:51.890Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
That sounds like a premature conclusion/hypothesis.
comment by Adam Zerner (adamzerner) · 2015-01-15T06:42:53.615Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I think that markets really really undervalue rationality. Kudos to you for (presumably) giving it the recognition it deserves and reaching out on Less Wrong.
And I think that it's awesome that HPMOR is required reading. Personally, I'd make the core sequences required reading.