In Praise of the Beatitudes

post by robotelvis · 2024-09-24T05:08:21.133Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for https://messyprogress.substack.com/p/in-praise-of-the-beatitudes

Contents

No comments

I’m not Christian now, but I used to be. I parted ways with Christianity because I came to identify as more of an Empiricist - believing that knowledge should come from experiment and observation, not writings in old sacred texts.

But some of the writing in those old sacred texts is actually really good.

The King James Bible contains roughly 770,000 words, including a lot of different books written by different people at different times saying different things. However, the writings in the Bible are not equally important, and there is broad agreement (at least among mainline Protestants) about which parts are the most important:

The New Testament outranks the Old Testament. The Gospels outrank the rest of the New Testament (hence the phrase “Gospel Truth”). The words of Jesus outrank other material in the Gospels. The Sermon on the Mount outranks the other words of Jesus. The Beatitudes are the most important part of the Sermon on the Mount. If someone comes at you with a quote from St Paul, and you counter with a quote from the Beatitudes, then you win.

The Beatitudes are Jesus’s own eight bullet summary of the Christian concept of morality. 

Each of the beatitudes consists of a “blessed are the” part, followed by a “for theirs is” part. In my mind the “blessed are” parts are the meat. I’m going to go through them one by one, giving my interpretation[1] of what each of them means:

If this sounds a lot like a summary of liberal pluralism, then that’s not a coincidence. Key figures in liberal thought, such as John Locke, drew strongly from the moral principles in the Beatitudes.

The Beatitudes are particularly significant when you compare them to the “flaunt your status, be certain in your beliefs, crush your enemies, bow to the powerful, win by any means necessary” morality that has been the “default ideology” for most of human history, and that still exerts a strong gravitational pull.

The Beatitudes are of course not unique in expressing these sentiments. There are writings in Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and Taoism that say similar things. Indeed I suspect that most reasonably successful societies have had some variant of these ideas, because a society has to resist the pull of “the default ideology” to avoid tearing itself apart. 

There are good reasons why Western society has been moving away from Christianity, and Christianity in practice has often done a poor job of following the principles laid down in the Beatitudes. But you don’t have to be Christian to revere the Beatitudes. We need them now as much as ever.

 

  1. ^

    The interpretation I give is pretty mainstream, but by no means the only interpretation. In particular, some people have more spiritual interpretation that are less applicable to non-believers.

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.