Personal AI Planning

post by jefftk (jkaufman) · 2024-11-10T14:00:06.837Z · LW · GW · 10 comments

Contents

10 comments

LLMs are getting much more capable, and progress is rapid. I use them in my daily work, and there are many tasks where they're usefully some combination of faster and more capable than I am. I don't see signs of these capability increases stopping or slowing down, and if they do continue I expect the impact on society to start accelerating as they exceed what an increasing fraction of humans can do. I think we could see serious changes in the next 2-5 years.

In my professional life, working on pathogen detection I take this pretty seriously. Advances in AI make it easier for adversaries to design and create pathogens, and so it's important to get a comprehensive detection system in place quickly. Similarly, more powerful AIs are likely to speed up our work in some areas (computational detection) more than others (partnerships) and increase the value of historical data, and I think about this in my planning at work.

In other parts of my life, though, I've basically been ignoring that I think this is likely coming. In deciding to get more solar panels and not get a heat pump I looked at historical returns and utility prices. I book dance gigs a year or more out. I save for retirement. I'm raising my kids in what is essentially preparation for the world of the recent past.

From one direction this doesn't make any sense: why wouldn't I plan for the future I see coming? But from another it's more reasonable: most scenarios where AI becomes extremely capable look either very good or very bad. Outside of my work, I think my choices don't have much impact here: if we all become rich, or dead, my having saved, spent, invested, or parented more presciently won't do much. Instead, in my personal life my decisions have the largest effects in worlds where AI ends up being not that big a deal, perhaps only as transformative as the internet has been.

Still, there are probably areas in our personal lives where it's worth doing something differently? For example:

What are other places where people should be weighing the potential impact of near-term transformative AI heavily in their decisions today? Are there places where most of us should be doing the same different thing?

10 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by sanxiyn · 2024-11-12T05:25:40.423Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I understand many people here are native English speakers, but I am not, and one thing I think about a lot is how much people should spend on learning English. Learning English is a big investment. Will AI advances make language barriers irrelevant? I am very uncertain about this and I would like to hear your opinions.

comment by Milan W (weibac) · 2024-11-10T20:43:12.010Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Assuming private property as currently legally defined is respected in a transition to a good post-TAI world, I think land (especially in areas with good post-TAI industrial potential) is a pretty good investment. It's the only thing that will keep on being just as scarce. You do have to assume the risk of our future AI(-enabled?) (overlords?) being Georgists, though.

Replies from: adam-jermyn
comment by Adam Jermyn (adam-jermyn) · 2024-11-10T21:09:13.187Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Unless we build more land (either in the ocean or in space)?

Replies from: weibac
comment by Milan W (weibac) · 2024-11-10T21:24:22.131Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

You're right. Space is big.

comment by David Gross (David_Gross) · 2024-11-10T16:16:47.312Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

A lot of the current education system aims to give children skills that they can apply to the job market as it existed 20 years ago or so. I think children would be better-advised to master more general skills that could be applied to a range of possible rapidly changing worlds: character skills like resilience, flexibility, industriousness, rationality, social responsibility, attention, caution, etc.

Come to think of it, such skills probably represent more reliable "investments" for us grown-ups too.

Replies from: jkaufman
comment by jefftk (jkaufman) · 2024-11-10T16:43:01.696Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Can you give examples of curriculum elements that you think are aimed at the world of 20 years ago? The usual criticism I see is that school is barely connected to the needs of the working world.

Replies from: martinkunev
comment by martinkunev · 2024-11-11T15:43:34.868Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Not exactly a response but some things from my experience. In elementary school in the late 90s we studied caligraphy. In high school (mid 2000s) we studied DOS.

Replies from: arjun-panickssery
comment by Arjun Panickssery (arjun-panickssery) · 2024-11-12T04:43:41.353Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

By "calligraphy" do you mean cursive writing?

Replies from: khafra, martinkunev
comment by khafra · 2024-11-12T08:03:36.467Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

In the late 80's, I was homeschooled, and studied caligraphy (as well as cursive); but I considered that more of a hobby than preparation for entering the workforce of 1000 years ago. 

I also learned a bit about DOS and BASIC, after being impressed with the fractal-generating program that the carpenter working on our house wrote, and demonstrated on our computer. 

comment by martinkunev · 2024-11-12T12:59:34.934Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

They were teaching us how to make handwriting beautiful and we had to exercice. The teacher would look at the notebooks and say stuff like "you see this letter? It's tilted in the wrong direction. Write it again!".

This was a compulsory part of the curriculum.