MIRI's 2014 Summer Matching Challenge
post by lukeprog · 2014-08-07T20:03:24.171Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 32 commentsContents
Donate Now Accomplishments Since Our Winter 2013 Fundraiser Launched: Ongoing Activities You Can Help Support None 32 comments
(Cross-posted from MIRI's blog. MIRI maintains Less Wrong, with generous help from Trike Apps, and much of the core content is written by salaried MIRI staff members.)
Thanks to the generosity of several major donors,† every donation made to MIRI between now and August 15th, 2014 will be matched dollar-for-dollar, up to a total of $200,000!
Now is your chance to double your impact while helping us raise up to $400,000 (with matching) to fund our research program.
Corporate matching and monthly giving pledges will count towards the total! Please email malo@intelligence.org if you intend on leveraging corporate matching (check here, to see if your employer will match your donation) or would like to pledge 6 months of monthly donations, so that we can properly account for your contributions towards the fundraiser.
(If you're unfamiliar with our mission, see: Why MIRI?)
Accomplishments Since Our Winter 2013 Fundraiser Launched:
- Hired 2 new Friendly AI researchers, Benja Fallenstein & Nate Soares. Since March, they've authored or co-authored 4 papers/reports, with several others in the works. Right now they're traveling, to present papers at the Vienna Summer of Logic, AAAI-14, and AGI-14.
- 5 new papers & book chapters: “Why We Need Friendly AI,” “The errors, insights, and lessons of famous AI predictions,” “Problems of self-reference...,” “Program equilibrium...,” and “The ethics of artificial intelligence.”
- 11 new technical reports: 7 reports from the December 2013 workshop, “Botworld,” “Loudness...,” “Distributions allowing tiling...,” and “Non-omniscience...”
- New book: Smarter Than Us, published both as an e-book and a paperback.
- Held one MIRI workshop and launched the MIRIx program, which currently supports 8 independently-organized Friendly AI discussion/research groups around the world.
- New analyses: Robby's posts on naturalized induction, Luke's list of 70+ studies which could improve our picture of superintelligence strategy, “Exponential and non-exponential trends in information technology,” “The world's distribution of computation,” “How big is the field of artificial intelligence?,” “Robust cooperation: A case study in Friendly AI research,” “Is my view contrarian?,” and “Can we really upload Johnny Depp's brain?”
- Won $60,000+ in matching and prizes from sources that wouldn't have otherwise given to MIRI, via the Silicon Valley Gives fundraiser. (Thanks again, all you dedicated donors!)
- 49 new expert interviews, including interviews with Scott Aaronson (MIT), Max Tegmark (MIT), Kathleen Fisher (DARPA), Suresh Jagannathan (DARPA), André Platzer (CMU), Anil Nerode (Cornell), John Baez (UC Riverside), Jonathan Millen (MITRE), and Roger Schell.
- 4 transcribed conversations about MIRI strategy: 1, 2, 3, 4.
- Published a thorough “2013 in review.”
Ongoing Activities You Can Help Support
- We're writing an overview of the Friendly AI technical agenda (as we see it) so far.
- We're currently developing and testing several tutorials on different pieces of the Friendly AI technical agenda (tiling agents, modal agents, etc.).
- We're writing several more papers and reports.
- We're growing the MIRIx program, largely to grow the pool of people we can plausibly hire as full-time FAI researchers in the next couple years.
- We're planning, or helping to plan, multiple research workshops, including the May 2015 decision theory workshop at Cambridge University.
- We're finishing the editing for a book version of Eliezer's Sequences.
- We're helping to fund further SPARC activity, which provides education and skill-building to elite young math talent, and introduces them to ideas like effective altruism and global catastrophic risks.
- We're continuing to discuss formal collaboration opportunities with UC Berkeley faculty and development staff.
- We're helping Nick Bostrom promote his Superintelligence book in the U.S.
- We're investigating opportunities for supporting Friendly AI research via federal funding sources such as the NSF.
Other projects are still being surveyed for likely cost and impact. See also our mid-2014 strategic plan. We appreciate your support for our work!
Donate now, and seize a better than usual opportunity to move our work forward. If you have questions about donating, please contact Malo Bourgon at malo@intelligence.org.
† $200,000 of total matching funds has been provided by Jaan Tallinn, Edwin Evans, and Rick Schwall.
Screenshot service provided by URL2PNG.com used to include self updating progress bar.
32 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by iceman · 2014-08-08T01:30:26.734Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Sent a check for $15,000.
I'm glad to see that publishing the Sequences is being prioritized. LessWrong is, sadly, dying and I'd love to have a published, edited version of Eliezer's original work that I can send to people.
Replies from: lukeprog, None↑ comment by lukeprog · 2014-08-08T01:39:17.964Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Received it! Thanks!
Yup, we are definitely aiming to have the Sequences book (not titled that) out by the end of the year.
Replies from: Vulture↑ comment by Vulture · 2014-08-08T02:20:26.722Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Any hints coming our way as to what the book edition will be titled? :)
Replies from: lukeprog↑ comment by lukeprog · 2014-08-14T00:10:31.974Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
After substantial agonizing and market research, we finally settled on:
Rationality, A to Z: Thinking Clearly about Beliefs, Values, and the World
(The posts are re-organized into three "volumes," which correspond roughly to volumes on beliefs, values, and the world.)
Replies from: shminux↑ comment by Shmi (shminux) · 2014-08-14T00:57:51.938Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Bah, I hoped for from AI to Zombies, but I suppose it's close enough.
↑ comment by [deleted] · 2014-08-13T19:34:13.084Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
LessWrong is, sadly, dying
Quite the opposite, in my opinion. To me it looks like it's growing up. The discussions are less and less in the informal style of the Sequences (which were meant to be informal, so that's on-target) and more and more formal.
Replies from: nshepperd↑ comment by nshepperd · 2014-08-14T02:44:48.320Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
And yet I see less and less evidence that people are actually reading the sequences, and more that this is being treated as "just another place to talk about your favourite 'philosophical' topics". Well, maybe the comments always sucked, but that's what it seems like to me.
comment by [deleted] · 2014-08-13T19:51:25.694Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I normally donate small sums only due to having a graduate student's monthly income. However, this list of accomplishments satisfies my full set of internal demands from your organization and exceeds my expectations from when I started sending you money, so you're getting more than I usually donate.
On the other hand, this qualifies as giving back the money I was reimbursed for MIRIx Tel-Aviv's lunch and then some. Oh well, ownership is an illusion.
Good job becoming thoroughly professional and beginning what I now expect to be a very fruitful integration with academia and the AGI community.
Now hurry the hell up! We're not getting any younger!
Replies from: lukeprogcomment by robot-dreams · 2014-08-12T23:40:50.653Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
It's cool that you guys accept XRP! I sent you all of my XRP (worth about $500).
Replies from: lukeprog, ArisKatsaris↑ comment by ArisKatsaris · 2014-08-13T00:35:45.840Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
MIRI had gotten a very large donation some months back in XRP from Jed McCaleb... and a few months after that XRP's value plummeted to a fourth of its earlier value (I think mainly because of something Jed McCaleb did, announced he'd sell/give away all the XRP he had or something) -- so I hope MIRI found the time to sell a good portion of the XRP, as it was planning to do.
Replies from: robot-dreams↑ comment by robot-dreams · 2014-08-13T21:23:06.774Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I hope so too! Also, I donated an additional $500 of actual USD which should hopefully be more stable.
comment by Skeptityke · 2014-08-14T22:33:29.126Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
When I last looked at the bar, it had 99 donors and ~80k dollars donated, and now it has 104 donors and ~190k dollars donated. From this, I can deduce that somebody donated a whole hell of a lot of money.
Positive reinforcement for the donor! Group approval for the benefactor! High fives and internet hugs all around!
Replies from: lukeprog↑ comment by lukeprog · 2014-08-15T05:10:26.777Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
:)
Replies from: Skeptityke↑ comment by Skeptityke · 2014-08-16T01:23:22.276Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Just sent 40 bucks your way. Though I am a college student, I decided that I wanted to begin a donation habit so future me is less likely to go "All discretionary income will be used on me personally". Thus, this.
Replies from: lukeprogcomment by ArisKatsaris · 2014-08-13T00:31:58.591Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Donated $500, just now.
I'm still mystified regarding why, for a month-long donation drive, you wait until a mere week till the end (when some people may have already left for holidays or something) before you post in LessWrong about it. Such delays have been done in the past too. If you feel this tactic works, fine, but it's sorta sending the wrong signals to me (feels as if it's either not caring enough LessWrong or not caring enough about donations in general), and this summer's drive isn't even half-complete mere days before the end.
Apologies for the grouchiness. Certain family issues of the moment are probably coloring my mood and attitude.
Replies from: lukeprog↑ comment by lukeprog · 2014-08-13T02:56:52.079Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Thanks!
The reason for the LW delay is just so we can get better information on the means by which people are hearing about our fundraising drive. So first we announce it to the blog, wait a few days, then announce it to hpmor, wait a few days, then announce it to the newsletter, wait a few days, then announce it to LW. We could juts as well have put LW at the beginning; maybe we'll do that next time!
Replies from: shminux↑ comment by Shmi (shminux) · 2014-08-13T22:47:24.606Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Tangential: I wonder if CFAR considered using Patreon in the Science or Education category to get subscriptions from patrons. Presumably some of the CFAR output, like videos and posters, counts as art.
comment by Danny_Hintze · 2014-08-14T03:20:03.030Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Donated $100!
Replies from: lukeprog