post by [deleted] · · ? · GW · 0 comments

This is a link post for

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Gurkenglas · 2021-03-08T17:04:57.187Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Sure, System 2 is your CPU and System 1 your GPU. System 1 can make you Ramanujan, and System 2 can make you Yudkowsky. It is System 2 that shuts up and multiplies, that debugs and steers. If our AIs end up having them, I expect us to die because of our failure to interpret its System 2, not 1.

Replies from: kman
comment by kman · 2021-03-09T00:05:11.152Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
comment by Jonathan_Graehl · 2021-03-08T20:40:46.831Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Please elaborate 'the best "simplified" way of looking at human intelligence is how well your "System 1" performs (approximately) Bayesian inference'

Replies from: kman
comment by kman · 2021-03-08T23:49:57.204Z · LW(p) · GW(p)