Brain-like AGI project "aintelope"

post by Gunnar_Zarncke · 2022-08-14T16:33:39.571Z · LW · GW · 2 comments

Contents

  Why us?
  What have we done so far?
  What do we want to do?
  How can you help?
None
2 comments

Steven Byrnes called for a brain-like AGI research agenda [? · GW], and three guys from the Hamburg EA community listened.

We are excited about Steven's five-star program 15.2.1.2 "Reverse-engineer human social instincts," [? · GW] and kicked off work a few weeks ago in June. We familiarized ourselves with Steven's brain-like AGI framework, and meet weekly now. 

This post is an announcement and a request for feedback and collaboration.

Why us?

We have a great skill fit: 

• A professional data scientist with the required machine learning experience to implement RL agents,
• A professional Python developer with game-programming background to implement the world mode, and visualization.
• A seasoned software engineer with startup CTO experience who takes care of everything else, e.g., this blog post (me).

What have we done so far?

We have already implemented a toy world and simple RL agent in a first iteration of Steven's framework. We build on top of the Python framework PettingZoo. Our code is in a private Github repo that we believe should stay private given the potential impact. Looking for thoughts on this. 

We have collected a list of more than 60 candidate instincts from neuroscience and other sources that we can implement and experiments with.

The project website will be here: https://www.aintelope.net/ (effectively empty right now).

The project and our progress so far were presented at the Human-aligned AI Summer School in Prague on August 5th, where we got feedback about the project, brain-like AGI in general, and found the three participants who wanted to collaborate.

What do we want to do?

Implementing models and running tests is a proven way to test theories and check our understanding of the models. Better quick success/failure on something where it is too easy to build a big theory [LW · GW]. 

Specifically, we want to:

• Show that a relatively simple set of instincts can shape complex behaviors of a single agent.
• Show whether the instincts lead to significantly reduced training time compared to agents without such instincts. 
• Extend the simulation to groups of agents. 
• Show that prosocial behavior can be shaped with few instincts.
• See if we can get Ersatz Interpretability [LW · GW] working.

In the ideal case, the simulated agents show behavior consistent with having values like altruism or honesty.

Immediate next steps:

• Implement food-related thought-assessors [? · GW].
• Implement different types of social cues to get to collaborative behavior. Probably not the three types [? · GW] suggested by Steven as motivating examples.

How can you help?

• Please give us feedback.
• Review what we already have (requires an invite, please request).
• Help with funding and growth of the project (I am applying to LTFF).
   

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.